32nd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 1996
DOI: 10.2514/6.1996-2708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending the range of SPT operation - Development status of 300 and 4500 W thruster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These range from sub-kW thrusters for small satellites, to 1.5 kW thrusters for station-keeping, to high power thrusters for orbit raising/transfer applications. [1][2][3][4] While a number of Hall thrusters have been, or are in the process of being, flight qualified 5,6 many of the basic physical processes inside the Hall thruster are still not fully understood. In order to improve the performance of the next generation of thrusters, as well as to address spacecraft interaction issues, the ionization and acceleration mechanisms inside the discharge chamber of the Hall thruster must be better understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These range from sub-kW thrusters for small satellites, to 1.5 kW thrusters for station-keeping, to high power thrusters for orbit raising/transfer applications. [1][2][3][4] While a number of Hall thrusters have been, or are in the process of being, flight qualified 5,6 many of the basic physical processes inside the Hall thruster are still not fully understood. In order to improve the performance of the next generation of thrusters, as well as to address spacecraft interaction issues, the ionization and acceleration mechanisms inside the discharge chamber of the Hall thruster must be better understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UT-1 kW HET [55] ---.690 ≈9.0 BN 42 SPT-70 [6] ≥3,000 ×, ‡ --.660 3.6 [56] borosil, BGP-10 [56] -, <60 [56] BHT-600 [15] >932 932 -.615 ≈3.6 [57] HBC BN 5.3 [57] SPT-50 [13] ≥2,500 × 825 -.320 -borosil 50-100 KM-45 [14] 3,500-4,000 1,020 3,500-4,000 * .310 4.1 -10-20 KM-32 [2] 3,000 ‡ 500 2,000-3,000 * .200 5.2 HP BN 23, 12 BHT-200 [15] >1,700 ‡ >1,700…”
Section: -50mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more complete summary of Hall thruster erosion measurements is provided in Table 4. SPT-50 [13] 320 47% >2,500 × -KM-45 [14] 310 40-50% [1] 3,500-4,000 -KM-32 [2] 200 30-40% 2,000-3,000 3,000 * BHT-200 [15] 200 43.5% 1,287-1,519 >1,700 HT-100 [16] 175 25% [4] 300 [17] 1,500 [17] * * SPT-30 [18] 150 26% [19] 600 * -SPT-20M [20] <100 ≤38% [5] 594-910 4,000…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direction of the magnetic field at the exit of the Hall thruster channel is perpendicular to the wall, and the potential lines are bent in the direction of the outlet of the channel, resulting in a larger divergence angle of the plume and serious corrosion of the channel wall, which eventually reduces the service life [5][6][7]. In view of the above, scientists proposed many ways to improve the performance of thrusters, such as changing the electromagnetic field configuration, the design of a reasonable channel size, optimizing the wall materials and so on, these methods are also been investigated by PIC simulation [8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%