Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Two major mature oilfields with multiple rigs (> 150) delivering hundreds of thousands of drilled metres annually, suffered from severe induced losses during their ongoing development and also redevelopment phases. These events of course significantly impacted the overall drilling performance, leading to substantial production issues and poor economics. Although the fundamental underlying nature of the losses varied; proven success in both cases was to significantly reduce the mud weight. Additionally, in both cases, the key to achieving this needed to be a solution using low-cost, minimal rig modification approaches while at the same time retaining the well productivity at equivalent levels. The applied solutions Team both identified and screened a number of approaches for achieving an effective MW reduction, and this process resulted in the proposal for the use of Hollow Glass Spheres (HGS) as the preferred methodology. A thorough study of the available literature and previous industry experience had demonstrated that HGS potentially met all of the requirements. In order to confirm the compatibility of the HGS, a series of laboratory tests were planned and performed; followed by a set of structured field trials, confirming the suitability of this technology. These results were then collated into a Basis of Design (BoD) for a drilling fluid system utilising HGS for drilling through target zones with abnormally low pore pressures, capturing lessons learned from all stages of their application. This paper will describe the details of the screening for the available solutions; as well as performing the feasibility study through laboratory tests and field trials. It will report on the phased approach taken for piloting the technology, describing the challenges and risks that were assessed, faced, and mitigated during both the testing and trialling stages. A review of the post-deployment lessons learned, techniques used, and approaches corrected during subsequent trial period(s) will be presented. A summary of the economic assumptions made, and their evolution will be covered; and then discussed with regards to technology upscaling and the further proposed developments and enhancements. The results of the HGS technical solution have greatly exceeded the original expectations and continuous improvement of the technology indicates much more to come. Discussions of the possible modifications and improvement to the HGS fluid system are ongoing and involve formulation, HGS type, logistics, strategy of HGS mud utilisation … etc. The use of HGS on these two oilfields has been novel and has resulted in a generally greater interest and appetite within the industry for this area of application.
Two major mature oilfields with multiple rigs (> 150) delivering hundreds of thousands of drilled metres annually, suffered from severe induced losses during their ongoing development and also redevelopment phases. These events of course significantly impacted the overall drilling performance, leading to substantial production issues and poor economics. Although the fundamental underlying nature of the losses varied; proven success in both cases was to significantly reduce the mud weight. Additionally, in both cases, the key to achieving this needed to be a solution using low-cost, minimal rig modification approaches while at the same time retaining the well productivity at equivalent levels. The applied solutions Team both identified and screened a number of approaches for achieving an effective MW reduction, and this process resulted in the proposal for the use of Hollow Glass Spheres (HGS) as the preferred methodology. A thorough study of the available literature and previous industry experience had demonstrated that HGS potentially met all of the requirements. In order to confirm the compatibility of the HGS, a series of laboratory tests were planned and performed; followed by a set of structured field trials, confirming the suitability of this technology. These results were then collated into a Basis of Design (BoD) for a drilling fluid system utilising HGS for drilling through target zones with abnormally low pore pressures, capturing lessons learned from all stages of their application. This paper will describe the details of the screening for the available solutions; as well as performing the feasibility study through laboratory tests and field trials. It will report on the phased approach taken for piloting the technology, describing the challenges and risks that were assessed, faced, and mitigated during both the testing and trialling stages. A review of the post-deployment lessons learned, techniques used, and approaches corrected during subsequent trial period(s) will be presented. A summary of the economic assumptions made, and their evolution will be covered; and then discussed with regards to technology upscaling and the further proposed developments and enhancements. The results of the HGS technical solution have greatly exceeded the original expectations and continuous improvement of the technology indicates much more to come. Discussions of the possible modifications and improvement to the HGS fluid system are ongoing and involve formulation, HGS type, logistics, strategy of HGS mud utilisation … etc. The use of HGS on these two oilfields has been novel and has resulted in a generally greater interest and appetite within the industry for this area of application.
A major development with multiple rigs delivering extensive multi-laterals encountered a pervasive mud-window issue within the reservoir. The resulting severe mud losses, extensive NPT and formation-damage was also deteriorating with time due to depletion. Conventional approaches to stem losses had failed and adoption of an energized mud-system with acceptable Effective Circulating Density (ECD) was not considered cost effective, pragmatic nor safe. Instead a novel application using Hollow-Glass-Spheres (HGS) was trialled, that demonstrated an effective and highly successful outcome. With 10 rigs drilling 60-70 wells per-year, each with 5,500 to 6,750m in the reservoir, quick resolution of the issue was required. For these reasons the Team at bp Russia looked carefully at alternatives that might fit the mud-window, but that offered a realistic approach for the environment and conditions in Eastern Siberia. The Team identified HGS as an approach to lighten the mud, often used for cementing ECD, application for drilling has been limited. For this approach we required an option with broad capabilities that could be scaled-up and exported to other development areas where such issues existed. This paper will report on the planning, delivery, and execution of a pilot on the Sb. field at TYNGD, in Eastern Siberia. Initially deployed on three wells, including multi-laterals, the paper will walk through the engineering considerations, during the planning and execution phases. Reporting comprehensively on the data gathered and the many lessons learned during the incremental and stepwise deployment. Data will be provided that demonstrated loss-free drilling was achieved where this had not occurred before, with a dramatic reduction in NPT, FLA needs and costs. The paper will also report on the post drilling productivity and comparison with offset wells drilled with conventional mud systems and suffering severe losses. The results of this pilot have beaten all expectations, there have been many insights and the Team are now looking to set a timetable to scale-up across the NOJV. Much has been learned, waste HGS material has been demonstrated to be an effective FLA pill in other sections of the well and centralisation of mud process may offer additional cost savings and improvements. Further efficiencies are expected to be achieved and potential across the Company portfolio could be a major game changer. HGS for cementing is well documented, application for drilling fluids has been less reported and almost exclusively applied to one-off sections/wells. The TYNGD application is novel as this is a major new development with 10 drilling rigs. Application is on multi-laterals and prior offset wells are available for direct comparison. The results of the approach demonstrate a new way of performing well construction in an effective manner for major Field Developments where losses are prevalent.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.