Extending the theory of planned behaviour to understand the effects of barriers towards sustainable fashion consumption

Abstract

Purpose Extending the theory of planned behaviour (TPB), this paper aims to measure the relative importance of different barriers to sustainable fashion consumption (SFC). Design/methodology/approach Existing studies have mainly adopted a qualitative methodology for identifying barriers to uptake of SFC, this study uses six of the main identified barriers: environmental apparel knowledge, perceived value, price sensitivity, product attributes and variety, availability and scepticism into the TPB framework to test and reveal which barriers have the greater impact on the TPB cognitions and consequently on building intention towards SFC. To test this model a survey study among 669 consumers from Europe, Asian and North America was conducted, structural equation modelling is used to test the research hypothesis. Findings Findings confirm the role of TPB cognitions on predicting intention and show that the proposed barriers provide a satisfactory explanation of the TPB model. Furthermore, results show that product attributes and variety and environmental apparel knowledge have the greatest impact on the TPB cognitions and on building intention towards SFC. Differences were found between the impacts of the price for the three continents. Originality/value This research contributes to the emerging sustainable fashion literature by examining the impact of different barriers to SFC in an extended TPB framework. To the best of our knowledge price sensitivity, availability and scepticism have never been studied in the context of sustainable fashion. It also provides a multifactor group analysis which uncovers differences among consumers from different continents.

Drivers of Sustainable Apparel Purchase Intention: An Empirical Study of Malaysian Millennial Consumers

“…Previous studies have identified a number of variables that influence consumers' perceived opportunity for sustainable consumption. Despite the awareness of environmental concerns, consumers tend to focus on price, value, and style in the decision to purchase sustainable clothes [44,45]. Limited retail stores, green alternatives, style, and size options often make purchasing the sustainable apparel challenging for consumers [46].…”

The Sustainability Pyramid: A Hierarchical Approach to Greater Sustainability and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals With Implications for Marketing Theory, Practice, and Public Policy

“…Products that are supposedly sustainable (e.g. hybrid cars, energy-saving light bulbs) have been greatly underwhelming, overpriced, inconvenient, ineffective, or unavailable (Brandão & da Costa, 2021;Lim & Weissmann, 2021;Lim et al, 2013;Olson, 2013;Weissmann, 2020;Weissmann & Hock, 2021). More often than not, anticonsumption, green, ethical, and social marketers have tried to prod consumers to act by relying on guilt or by encouraging them to "save the Earth" (Mkono & Hughes, 2020;Nakajima, 2001), neither of which has turned out to be particularly aspirational or appealing.…”

Influencing millennials to embrace sustainable fashion in an emerging market: a modified brand avoidance model perspective

“…The concept of sustainable fashion is anchored on the triple bottom line principle that emphasizes the need to maintain an intricate balance of environmental, economic and social goals (Chandran and Bhattacharya, 2019). Critics of the sustainable fashion movement perceive it as a ploy to maximize profit by using the environment as a selling proposition (McNeill and Moore, 2015;Brandao and Costa, 2021). Moreover, greenwashing concerns have been raised, defined as the act of using unsubstantiated environmental claims to market fashion products (Fernando et al, 2014;Mahsud et al, 2018).…”

“…Critics of sustainable fashion are also concerned with the high premium price which is beyond the reach of many consumers (Ritch, 2015;Brandao and Costa, 2021). For instance, previous studies found that consumers are only willing to pay an average of 10-20 per cent premium on sustainable fashion (Žurga and Forte, 2014;Ciasullo et al, 2017).…”