2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3624790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensibility enables locomotion under isotropic drag

Abstract: Anisotropic viscous drag is usually believed to be a requirement for the low Reynolds number locomotion of slender bodies such as flagella and cilia. Here we show that locomotion under isotropic drag is possible for extensible slender bodies. After general considerations, a two-ring swimmer and a model dinoflagellate flagellum are studied analytically to illustrate how extensibility can be exploited for self-propulsion without drag anisotropy. This new degree of freedom could be useful for some complex swimmer… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar example is a toroidal helix (a helix built upon a circle), which is an idealized model studied recently for dinoflagellates [42]. We expect that the propagation of a wave along a toroidal helix should also require extensibility, and that propulsion is still possible even without drag anisotropy [41]. …”
Section: ð3:4þmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar example is a toroidal helix (a helix built upon a circle), which is an idealized model studied recently for dinoflagellates [42]. We expect that the propagation of a wave along a toroidal helix should also require extensibility, and that propulsion is still possible even without drag anisotropy [41]. …”
Section: ð3:4þmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The superhelical kinematics described (equations (2.12) -(2.14)) are possible only when extensibility is allowed; the minor helix is built upon another curved structure (the major helix) and local extension and contraction is implied in the wave kinematics. When extensibility is permitted, the relaxation of the drag anisotropy requirement has been recently shown [41]. That the swimming speed is non-zero is owing to intrinsic variations in length (and hence drag) embedded in the curved geometry of the superhelices.…”
Section: ð3:4þmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, drag anisotropy is the critical physical ingredient to allow motion of the geometric center of a swimmer, and without it a net translation is impossible [27]. Indeed, consider an inextensible [28] filament of length L described by the centerline location r(s, t) and deforming its shape with the instantaneous velocity U(s, t) in the laboratory frame of reference ( Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…since the swimmer is force-free at all times. Allowing the body to be extensible can break this condition, prompting the creation of many popular theoretical models, like extensible filament swimming [28] and three sphere swimmers [29,30]. However for many microswimmers, which are inextensible, drag anisotropy is a fundamental constraint on whether an organism can translate at low Reynolds number.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anisotropy is also important when the tumbling parameter l approaches unity, marks the transition from tumbling to flow-aligning nematic fluids 45 . Equations (6,7,15,16) are all singular in the limit l ! 1 .The thickness of the boundary layer is seen to be 1-11 | 7 5 (Color online) Dimensionless swimming speed U vs Er = tw for a transverse-wave swimmer with µ = µ 1 = µ 2 = 1, Kr = 1.2, and 0.6, with anchoring strengths w = 0 (blue), w = 0.1 (red), w = 1 (green), and w = 5 (brown).…”
Section: Solution For General Ericksen Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%