2011
DOI: 10.2514/1.j051177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extension and Exploration of a Hybrid Turbulence Model on Unstructured Grids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This location has previously been identified as a region of transition from laminar to turbulent flow, contrary to the fully turbulent assumption made in the present methodology and in Sørensen et al . Although the advanced hybrid RANS/LES approach has been demonstrated to predict flow separation in a turbulent flow much more accurately than RANS methods, the significant turbulent kinetic energy near the leading edge generated from the fully turbulent flow assumption prevents the stall from occurring. The inability to stabilize the simulation at the prescribed thrust also confirms the presence of transition, as the fully turbulent assumption would not be physically correct.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This location has previously been identified as a region of transition from laminar to turbulent flow, contrary to the fully turbulent assumption made in the present methodology and in Sørensen et al . Although the advanced hybrid RANS/LES approach has been demonstrated to predict flow separation in a turbulent flow much more accurately than RANS methods, the significant turbulent kinetic energy near the leading edge generated from the fully turbulent flow assumption prevents the stall from occurring. The inability to stabilize the simulation at the prescribed thrust also confirms the presence of transition, as the fully turbulent assumption would not be physically correct.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of turbulence methods are available, including Spalart–Allmaras, Menter k ‐ ω shear‐stress transport (SST) and DES models. A hybrid RANS/LES turbulence simulation method that has been previously shown to improve separated flow field resolution and configuration performance compared with the Menter k ‐ ω SST RANS model has also been incorporated.…”
Section: Computational Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, HRLES data validated for turbulent bluff body flows including dynamic cases (Refs. 17,[21][22][23][24][25][26] have been employed to generate the quasi-steady data set. The details of the solver, grids, and conditions for the computation of quasi-steady aerodynamic coefficients for 3D rectangular prism and cylinder geometries have been presented previously (Refs.…”
Section: Quasi-steady Aerodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,27,28), thanks in large part to the hybrid RANS-LES turbulence approach, which resolves large turbulent eddies in the wake (Ref. 22) and to a feature-based unsteady overset grid adaptation capability (Ref. 29).…”
Section: Quasi-steady Aerodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two interesting items are found. In the literature, it is widely known that for unstructured vertex-centered solver using median-dual control volume (hereafter denoted as MD-VC for short), if stretched triangular/tetrahedral cells are used to mesh the boundary layer, then the solver suffers from excessive dissipation caused by the misalignment between the mesh and the flow [17][18][19][20][21]. However, in this work, it is very interesting to find that the weighted meshless solver is much less sensitive to the misalignment, and the numerical dissipation is much smaller.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%