2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2017.04.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extension of activation cross section data of long lived products in deuteron induced nuclear reactions on platinum up to 50 MeV

Abstract: In the frame of a systematical study of light ion induced nuclear reactions on platinum, activation cross sections for deuteron induced reactions were investigated. Excitation functions were measured in the 20.8 -49.2 MeV energy range for the nat Pt(d,xn) 191,192,193,194,195,196m2,196g,198g,199 Au, nat Pt(d,x) 188,189,191,195m,197m,197g Pt and nat Pt(d,x) 189,190,192,194m2 Ir reactions by using the stacked foil irradiation technique. The experimental results are compared with previous results from the liter… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
6
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
11
6
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2). A good agreement with the earlier experimental studies [6,7] in the overlapping energy interval is seen. Because none of the theoretical model code gave acceptable predictions for the experimental values an estimated prediction from the systematics has also be presented in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…2). A good agreement with the earlier experimental studies [6,7] in the overlapping energy interval is seen. Because none of the theoretical model code gave acceptable predictions for the experimental values an estimated prediction from the systematics has also be presented in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…(d,xn) 196m2 Au reaction Direct production cross-sections for the T 1/2 = 9.6 h isomeric state 196m2 Au are shown in Fig. 5 and agree well with the Ditroi et al [6] data. All theoretical model codes recognize the two maxima, but all overestimate the experimental values.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations