2007
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extension of the MST continuum solvation model to the RM1 semiempirical hamiltonian

Abstract: The need to simulate large-sized molecules or to deal with large series of compounds is a challenging topic in computational chemistry, which has stimulated the development of accurate semiempirical methods, such as the recently reported Recife Model 1 (RM1; J Comput Chem 2006, 27, 1101). Even though RM1 may prove to be of value simply due to the enhanced quantitative accuracy in gas phase, it is unclear how the new parameters optimized for RM1 affect the suitability of this semiempirical Hamiltonian to study … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major drawback of the approach is its computational cost, which renders it unsuitable for high-throughput applications. Nevertheless, the method can be used to generate a benchmark set to test, and perhaps train, faster energy functions such as our recently implemented RM1 MST solvation model, 36 corrected semiempirical methods, 37 and others. Considering that 3D virtual screening methods have to generate conformers of up to 20 kcal mol 21 to ensure that the bioactive conformation can be found, we expect that the introduction of good quality energy functions will drastically reduce the number of configurations to consider, which should bring about a major decrease in the number of false positives and, in consequence, more reliable results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major drawback of the approach is its computational cost, which renders it unsuitable for high-throughput applications. Nevertheless, the method can be used to generate a benchmark set to test, and perhaps train, faster energy functions such as our recently implemented RM1 MST solvation model, 36 corrected semiempirical methods, 37 and others. Considering that 3D virtual screening methods have to generate conformers of up to 20 kcal mol 21 to ensure that the bioactive conformation can be found, we expect that the introduction of good quality energy functions will drastically reduce the number of configurations to consider, which should bring about a major decrease in the number of false positives and, in consequence, more reliable results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the compounds used in our training set are structurally rigid with little or no conformational freedom, thus, no geometry change was assumed on gas-water transition, in line with standard procedures. [85][86][87] The complete list of the training compounds, along with the computed and experimental hydration free energies is presented in Table S1 of the Supporting Information, together with the description of the optimization protocol, and the optimized parameters (cf. Table S2).…”
Section: The Mm/qm-cosmo Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Although these solvation methods for uncharged molecules experienced notable advances in the last years, for charged species the models implicitly assume that no ion-pairing occurs and neglect the direct effects of counter ions and of other species in the liquid media. However, in the field of polyoxometalates (POMs), experiments demonstrate the dramatic influence of the environment on the electronic properties of POMs in solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%