2014
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2014.931567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extension of the Smoluchowski Theory to Transitions from Dilute to Dense Regime of Brownian Coagulation: Triple Collisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy between the analytical and numerical results was evaluated by the root mean square error (RMSE), which is shown as a function of φ and R in Supplementary Figure S3. In general, the results show higher values of the RMSE for smaller NPs and larger φ, which is in agreement with previous results: it was shown that the classic aggregation theory works well for extremely dilute solutions, namely φ < 0.1%, which are controlled by binary collisions, whereas are dominating in systems with larger φ, thus leading to faster aggregation is higher than the one predicted by the original model [65]. Clearly, when small NPs are considered, the theoretical model overestimates the mobility of large aggregates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discrepancy between the analytical and numerical results was evaluated by the root mean square error (RMSE), which is shown as a function of φ and R in Supplementary Figure S3. In general, the results show higher values of the RMSE for smaller NPs and larger φ, which is in agreement with previous results: it was shown that the classic aggregation theory works well for extremely dilute solutions, namely φ < 0.1%, which are controlled by binary collisions, whereas are dominating in systems with larger φ, thus leading to faster aggregation is higher than the one predicted by the original model [65]. Clearly, when small NPs are considered, the theoretical model overestimates the mobility of large aggregates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The setups with smaller NPs exhibit greater deviations from theoretical predictions (see Figure 7A,B for R = 0.78 nm and Figure 7C,D for R = 1.5 nm): while aggregation proceeds faster at low simulation times, after about 2 µs it will proceed more slowly than the Smolochowski model. This result can be interpreted considering that aggregation in highly concentrated solutions could initially proceed faster due to multi-particle collisions, whereas the Smoluchowski theory only considers binary collisions [65], and slow down at higher times due to the reduced mobility of larger aggregates. On the other hand, the largest particles tested presented faster aggregation kinetics with respect to the theoretical model (see Figure 7E,F).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, agglomerate morphology and structure affect handling and processing and eventually agglomerate performance, 13 while mobility determines agglomerates' transport and dispersal properties. 5 Even though Brownian coagulation is reasonably well understood for fully coalescing particles at both dilute 14 and high concentrations, 15,16 little is known about the dynamics of agglomerates during coagulation, especially in the transition regime where the gas mean free path is comparable to the agglomerate radius. Vemury and Pratsinis 17 showed the attainment of self-preserving size distributions (SPSDs) by coagulation of agglomerates with constant D f in the free molecular and continuum regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cases represent the potential directions for expanding the theory. Generally speaking, the evolution of non-spherical particles changes the collision-frequency function and requires developing numerical calculations (see, among others, [49][50][51]). Taking this into account we expect that the theory under consideration is suitable when the shape of the particles or aggregates is close to spherical.…”
Section: The Model Of Coalescence Combined With Coagulationmentioning
confidence: 99%