1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0207(19970430)40:8<1413::aid-nme118>3.0.co;2-#
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extension of the Zienkiewicz–zhu Error Estimator to Shape Sensitivity Analysis

Abstract: SUMMARYThe application of the Zienkiewicz-Zhu estimator was extended to the estimation of the discretization error arising from shape sensitivity analysis using the finite element method. The sensitivity error was quantified from the sensitivity of the energy norm by using an estimator specially developed for this purpose. Sensitivity analyses were carried out using the discrete analytical approach, which introduced no additional errors other than the discretization error. In this work, direct nodal averaging … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fuenmayor et al 4 extended the Zienkiewicz–Zhu error estimator 7 to shape sensitivity analysis in order to develop a discretization error estimator for shape sensitivity analysis, obtaining the expression shown in (9). This proves that the sensitivity of the error is equivalent to the error in sensitivities .…”
Section: Evolutionary Algorithms With Mesh Generation By Projectiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fuenmayor et al 4 extended the Zienkiewicz–Zhu error estimator 7 to shape sensitivity analysis in order to develop a discretization error estimator for shape sensitivity analysis, obtaining the expression shown in (9). This proves that the sensitivity of the error is equivalent to the error in sensitivities .…”
Section: Evolutionary Algorithms With Mesh Generation By Projectiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, in this paper we propose the use of the h ‐adaptive analysis technique for generations of individuals described in 1. The procedure consists of using the sensitivity analysis of the discretization error in energy norm with respect to the design variables 2–4 to project the error obtained from a representative individual of the generation into the different geometrical configurations to be analyzed. H ‐adapted meshes for the analysis of each particular individual can be created with this information, which in the vast majority of cases provides FE results with the prescribed accuracy; thus, avoiding the high computational cost associated with the full h ‐adaptive remeshing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 1 To simplify the evaluation of ∂σ * ∂a m we considered ∂σ * ∂a m = ∂σ ∂a m * . The numerical results will show that this approximation, previously used in [19], does not influence the results.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Speciÿcally, as noted recently by Fuenmayor et al [33], the success of adaptive reÿnement is highly sensitive to the initial mesh resolution. If the initial mesh is too coarse, the solution based on adaptive mesh reÿnement may never converge to the true solution.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Since the error estimator uses a smoothed stress ÿeld from the FE approximation rather than the true stress ÿeld, its e cacy depends on the chosen manner of smoothing. It is now recognized [33] that the L 2 projection method is asymptotically correct only when the mesh discretization error is modest. Recently, new smoothing techniques like Super-convergent Patch Recovery [34] and Recovery by Equilibrium Patches [35] have been developed to enhance the precision in estimating the discretization error.…”
Section: Voxel-based Meshing and Adaptive Reÿnementmentioning
confidence: 99%