2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2008.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensional and magmatic nature of the Campbell Plateau and Great South Basin from deep crustal studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The source of this is both thick high‐density lower crust and a thick mantle root (see section 4.3) [ Stern et al ., ; Bourguinon et al ., ], as a consequence of Cenozoic lithospheric shortening [ Stern et al ., ]. Taken together with the evidence for subdued relief at or below sea level around ∼23 Ma, the previous analysis indicates that the initial crustal thickness throughout southern South Island was not thicker than that at the coast today (i.e., 25–32 km, thickening toward the south), and most likely thinner (23–27 km), comparable to the crustal thickness farther offshore where there is no evidence for Cenozoic deformation [ Godfrey et al ., ; Scherwath et al ., ; Grobys et al ., ]. Estimates of initial crustal thickness for each transect, used to calculate post 23 Ma crustal thickening and shortening (section 2.2.3), are shown in Figure b.…”
Section: Crustal Thickening Beneath the Southern Alpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The source of this is both thick high‐density lower crust and a thick mantle root (see section 4.3) [ Stern et al ., ; Bourguinon et al ., ], as a consequence of Cenozoic lithospheric shortening [ Stern et al ., ]. Taken together with the evidence for subdued relief at or below sea level around ∼23 Ma, the previous analysis indicates that the initial crustal thickness throughout southern South Island was not thicker than that at the coast today (i.e., 25–32 km, thickening toward the south), and most likely thinner (23–27 km), comparable to the crustal thickness farther offshore where there is no evidence for Cenozoic deformation [ Godfrey et al ., ; Scherwath et al ., ; Grobys et al ., ]. Estimates of initial crustal thickness for each transect, used to calculate post 23 Ma crustal thickening and shortening (section 2.2.3), are shown in Figure b.…”
Section: Crustal Thickening Beneath the Southern Alpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative plate motions in the New Zealand region during the Cenozoic are determined from magnetic anomalies and fracture zones in the sea floor between Antarctica and the Australian and Pacific Plates, together with the orientation of fracture zones to the south of New Zealand, created during Eocene-Oligocene sea floor spreading between the Australian and Pacific plates [Sutherland, 1995;Sutherland et al, 2000;Cande and Stock, 2004;Keller, 2004;Croon et al, 2008;Barker et al, 2009;Sandwell et al 2014] (S. Lamb and E. Smith, Calculating Cenozoic Australia-Pacific stage Euler poles in the New Zealand region, manuscript in preparation, 2015). Cande and Stock [2004] revised the Australian-Pacific Plate rotation poles determined by Walcott [1998], which were based on lower resolution fracture zone data for sea floor spreading between Australia and Antarctica [Royer and Sandwell, 1989].…”
Section: Cenozoic Plate Motions In the New Zealand Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the Rockall Bank, this layer is believed to be serpentinized upper mantle (O'Reilly et al, 1996). For the continental fragments off the Australian margin, the high velocity lower layer is interpreted as mafic underplating (Grobys et al, 2009). Mostly, the high velocity seismic layer is found below the surrounding basins with oceanic or thinned continental crust.…”
Section: Continental Fragments and Microcontinents: Crustal Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bulk densities are also reported from studies where the authors combined gravity and seismic data to determine crustal density. References are (1) Funck et al (2008), (2) Grobys et al (2007), (3) Cooper et al (1981), (4) Grobys et al (2009), (5) Borissova et al (2003), (6) Klingelhoefer et al (2007), (7) Funck (2003), (8) Gerlings et al (2011), (9) Fowler et al (1989), (10) Breivik et al (2012), (11) Lebedeva-Ivanova et al (2006), (12) Morewood et al (2005), (13) Vogt et al (1998), and (14) Collier et al (2009 In the geological record, large volumes of crustal accretion are carried out by the collision of composite terranes or continental fragments onto continents (Vink et al, 1984). In North America, the amalgamation of the Wrangellia and Stikinia terranes resulted in a ribbon continent (SABIYA) that was ∼ 8000 km long and ∼ 500 km wide (Johnston, 2001).…”
Section: Composite Terranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, many authors postulate that the lower crust of oceanic plateaus, submarine ridges, and island arcs is an ultramafic cumulate layer that serves as a detachment layer during accretion [ Behn and Kelemen , 2006; Schubert and Sandwell , 1989; Mann and Taira , 2004]. Continental fragments are typically rifted off blocks from continents (e.g., Campbell Plateau: Grobys et al [2009], Rockall Bank: Klingelhoefer et al [2005], and the Seychelles: Collier et al [2009]), and therefore have pre‐existing weaknesses from extension. This paper presents a first‐order examination of terrane accretion with respect to buoyancy, rheology, and internal strength of the FAT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%