1989
DOI: 10.1016/0047-259x(89)90097-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensions of results of Komlós, Major, and Tusnády to the multivariate case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
87
0
16

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
87
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof relies on a progressive blocking technique (see Bernstein [2]) coupled with a triadic Cantor like scheme and on the Komlós, Major and Tusnády approximation type results for independent r.v. 's (see [22], [10], [42]), which is in contrast to approaches usually based on martingale methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proof relies on a progressive blocking technique (see Bernstein [2]) coupled with a triadic Cantor like scheme and on the Komlós, Major and Tusnády approximation type results for independent r.v. 's (see [22], [10], [42]), which is in contrast to approaches usually based on martingale methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The rates of convergence in the weak invariance principle, for independent r.v. 's have been obtained in Prokhorov [31], Borovkov [3], Komlós, Major and Tusnády [22], Einmahl [10], Sakhanenko [34], [35], Zaitsev [42] among others. For δ ≤ 1 2 , in the case of martingale-differences, the rates are essentially the same as in the independent case (see, for instance Hall and Heyde [19], Kubilius [23], Grama [11]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7] (see also the references therein). Our approach is to use Theorem 1.2 together with the strong approximation results of [15] and [20].…”
Section: Proof Of the Lattice Torus Covering Time Conjecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 2.1 is related to the results of Einmahl (1987Einmahl ( , 1989 who obtained strong approximations for partial sums of independent and identically distributed random vectors with zero mean and with identity covariance matrix. In our setting, for any fixed d, the covariance matrix is not the identity, but this is not the central difficulty.…”
Section: Uniform Normal Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our setting, for any fixed d, the covariance matrix is not the identity, but this is not the central difficulty. The main value of Theorem 2.1 stems from the fact that it shows how the rate of the approximation depends on d; no such information is contained in the work of Einmahl (1987Einmahl ( , 1989, who did not need to consider the dependence on d. The explicit dependence of the right hand side of (2.5) on d is crucial in the applications presented in the following sections in which the dimension of the projection space depends on the sample size N. Very broadly speaking, Theorem 2.1 implies that in all reasonable statistics based on averaging the scores, even in those based on an increasing number of FPC's, the partial sums of scores can be replaced by Wiener processes to obtain a limit distribution. The right hand side of (2.5) allows us to derive assumptions on the eigenvalues required to obtain a specific result.…”
Section: Uniform Normal Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%