Extensions of the FOM Method-proton SEL and atmospheric neutron SEU

Normand, E.

doi:10.1109/tns.2004.839170

Cited by 15 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…PRESTAGE was used to calculate the SEL cross-sections induced by 200 MeV protons based on the information provided in Table 4. Table 5 presents the comparison between the calculated results and the measured data [23] .The ratio in the last column is the PRESTAGE calculated cross-section divided by the measured one. Good agreement is observed in the comparisons.…”

Section: Calculation Results For Sel Effectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Monte Carlo predictions of proton SEE cross-sections from heavy ion test data

Geng²,

Zhang

et al. 2016

Chinese Phys. C

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The limits of previous methods promote us to design a new approach (named PRESTAGE) to predict proton single event effect (SEE) cross-sections using heavy-ion test data. To more realistically simulate the SEE mechanisms, we adopt Geant4 and the location-dependent strategy to describe the physics processes and the sensitivity of the device.Cross-sections predicted by PRESTAGE for over twenty devices are compared with the measured data. Evidences show that PRESTAGE can calculate not only single event upsets induced by proton indirect ionization, but also direct ionization effects and single event latch-ups. Most of the PRESTAGE calculated results agree with the experimental data within a factor of 2-3.

show abstract

Section: Calculation Results For Sel Effectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Monte Carlo predictions of proton SEE cross-sections from heavy ion test data

Geng²,

Zhang

et al. 2016

Chinese Phys. C

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The methods for calculating neutroninduced SEUs include the burst generation rate approach [136] and Monte Carlo simulations [137]. Normand [138] has shown that the proton limiting cross section, , can be used to obtain and estimate of the SEU rate for neutrons. Normand report that the neutron-induced SEU rate at 40,000 ft and 45 degrees latitude is , or using Petersen's FoM, he obtains For detailed advice on the best way to make SEE rate predictions of proton-and neutroninduced SEEs, see [111], [114] and [138].…”

Section: Best Practices For Error Rate Prediction With the Rpp And The Irpp Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

CRÈME96 and Related Error Rate Prediction Methods

Adams

2017

Extreme Environment Electronics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Petersen himself established the correlation between FOM and bit error rate for heavy ions [1], and protons [2]. Normand [4] established the correlation between bit error rate and FOM for atmospheric neutrons at aircraft altitudes. He calculated expected avionics error rates for several parts using both the Bendel Two Parameter model, and the Burst Generation Rate model.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%