2011
DOI: 10.3354/meps09033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensive micro-geographical shell polymorphism in a planktotrophic marine intertidal snail

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly interesting because the shell size and shape differences existing between the RB and SU morphs have been previously interpreted in adaptive terms (reviewed in [ 4 ] for CS and RW1), for which a genetic basis with a small contribution from developmental plasticity has been demonstrated [ 5 , 19 , 48 , 49 ]. Additionally, two different snail species ( Nucella lapillus and Melarraphe neritoides ) showed a similar parallel trend in shell shape (RW1) across the same environmental cline [ 50 ]. The SRB morph lives in the most sheltered habitats and shows the most extreme sheltered morphological traits of all Galician morphotypes reported so far, displaying the largest shells and smallest apertures ( Fig 1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly interesting because the shell size and shape differences existing between the RB and SU morphs have been previously interpreted in adaptive terms (reviewed in [ 4 ] for CS and RW1), for which a genetic basis with a small contribution from developmental plasticity has been demonstrated [ 5 , 19 , 48 , 49 ]. Additionally, two different snail species ( Nucella lapillus and Melarraphe neritoides ) showed a similar parallel trend in shell shape (RW1) across the same environmental cline [ 50 ]. The SRB morph lives in the most sheltered habitats and shows the most extreme sheltered morphological traits of all Galician morphotypes reported so far, displaying the largest shells and smallest apertures ( Fig 1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CS; U1, degree of globosity; RW1, relative shell aperture) differences between RB and SU ecotypes can only be interpreted in adaptive terms (Carvajal‐Rodríguez et al ., ; Conde‐Padín et al ., , ). Moreover, two other polymorphisms of gastropod species ( Melarhaphe neritoides , Cuña et al ., ; García et al ., ; the dogwhelk Nucella lapillus , Guerra‐Varela et al ., ) affecting shell aperture (RW1) have been detected on the same shores and microhabitats as the RB and SU polymorphism. Hence, exogenous selection acting on shell traits might play an important role in the observed microhabitat distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photoperiod was set to a 14/10-h light/dark cycle and the snails were able to graze on the algae growing on the nylon mesh during this time. Note that specimens of M. neritoides have been maintained alive (and showing shell growth) in similar conditions for 9 ( Cuña et al 2011 ) and 15 months ( García et al 2013 ), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this intertidal level, M. neritoides is commonly sheltered in crevices to avoid desiccation ( Fretter and Manley 1977 ; Raffaelli and Hughes 1978 ; Britton 1995 ) and can be exposed to emersion for weeks ( Britton 1992 ); it is proven to survive this stress for at least 5 months ( Lysaght 1941 ). Lower shore and high-shore subpopulations from the same locality have been found to be morphologically different (shell size and shape) although they lacked genetic differentiation based on AFLPs (amplified fragment length polymorphisms) ( Cuña et al 2011 ). In contrast, these morphologically different subpopulations (morphs) showed significant differences at the proteome level (22%) when exposed to a common laboratory environment, suggesting a certain level of phenotypic plasticity in this species ( García et al 2013 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%