2011
DOI: 10.1128/aem.00457-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extent and Variation of Phage-Borne Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene Sequences in Wastewater Environments

Abstract: Phage metagenomes isolated from wastewater over a 12-month period were analyzed. The results suggested that various strains of Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and other phyla are likely to participate in transduction. The patterns of 16S rRNA sequences found in phage metagenomes did not follow changes in the total bacterial community.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the high proportion of unassigned sequences and relatively low number of 16S rRNA matching sequences (Supplementary Table 3) supported a viral origin for the bacterially annotated reads. Because bacterial genes can be packaged into generalized transducing phage particles (Beumer and Robinson, 2005; Ghosh et al , 2008; Del Casale et al , 2011), the bacterial-like sequences in the guelta metagenomes might come from excised prophages mistakenly annotated as bacterial and/or from genes of bacterial origins that were transferred to their phages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the high proportion of unassigned sequences and relatively low number of 16S rRNA matching sequences (Supplementary Table 3) supported a viral origin for the bacterially annotated reads. Because bacterial genes can be packaged into generalized transducing phage particles (Beumer and Robinson, 2005; Ghosh et al , 2008; Del Casale et al , 2011), the bacterial-like sequences in the guelta metagenomes might come from excised prophages mistakenly annotated as bacterial and/or from genes of bacterial origins that were transferred to their phages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ribosomal 16S are highly conserved bacterial DNA segments and many bacteria have multiple copies, thereby making this a gene that has a high chance of transduction compared to other genes. [34][35][36] Therefore, testing for bacteriophages having 16S in their virion heads indirectly evaluates the generalized transduction potential for a bacteriophage. This testing includes denaturing the bacteriophage therapeutic capsid to release the phage DNA and then using 16S polymerase chain reaction to amplify 16S genes if these are present.…”
Section: Testing For Transduction Of Ribosomal 16smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This testing includes denaturing the bacteriophage therapeutic capsid to release the phage DNA and then using 16S polymerase chain reaction to amplify 16S genes if these are present. [34][35][36] While not a perfect testing platform, this is an indirect way of assessing the potential for generalized transduction.…”
Section: Testing For Transduction Of Ribosomal 16smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cloning of 16S rRNA genes was carried out as described previously [11] at depths of 2.1 m and 5.9 m as these depths were found on either side of the sulphate boundary [8]. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were grouped by restriction analysis using Fastdigest RSaI and HaeIII (Fermentas) restriction enzymes.…”
Section: Cloning and Sequence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amplification efficiency ranged from 91% to 105% with samples analyzed in triplicate. Samples of qPCR products were chosen at random, cloned, as described previously [11] and sequenced to confirm product identity.…”
Section: Qpcrmentioning
confidence: 99%