2015
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001964.pub4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extent of lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma of the stomach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is supported by a recent meta-analysis suggesting no significant difference in OS between these two types of lymph node dissection (22). This, however, must be cautiously interpreted because our median follow-up was 46.5 months and some authors argue that the survival benefit is apparent only after a longer follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This finding is supported by a recent meta-analysis suggesting no significant difference in OS between these two types of lymph node dissection (22). This, however, must be cautiously interpreted because our median follow-up was 46.5 months and some authors argue that the survival benefit is apparent only after a longer follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…As one of the most important determinants of recurrence and long-term survival in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy is nodal metastases, management of nodal disease is a key component to ensuring the best patient outcome (5). Specifically, the proper extent of lymph node dissection and the specific number of nodes required for adequate staging has generated decades of discourse with variable worldwide practice (6, 7). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12]22,23 Recent evidence supports a modified D2 resection, sparing the spleen and pancreatic lymph nodes in the elderly and might expand its suitability in this group of patients. 24 In our study, a significantly higher number of D2 resections were performed in the elderly group of patients. There was no significant difference in the rate of complications and mortality between the two groups in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%