2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.12.1662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extent of Nucleotide-Binding Domain (NBD) Separation When a CFTR Channel Closes

Abstract: that though CFTRinh-172 can bind to both open and closed state of the channel, at least one additional step, presumably reflecting inhibitorinduced conformational changes, is required to shut down the conductance following binding of the inhibitor to the channel. Our data also indicate that stabilization of the open state leads to more potent inhibition: K 1/2 is reduced to nanomolar range for locked-open CFTR channels. Interestingly, we found that although there is >95% homology between pig and human proteins… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What mechanistic insight can be gained from these observations? The recent suggestion that composite site 1 of CFTR does not separate upon channel closure (Tsai et al, 2010; Szollosi et al, 2011) has fostered a view of the degenerate site as a simple rigid scaffold, which does not participate in the functional movements of asymmetric ABC-C proteins (although this proposal has remained a matter of contention; Artur et al, 2011). Our present data are hard to reconcile with such an assignment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What mechanistic insight can be gained from these observations? The recent suggestion that composite site 1 of CFTR does not separate upon channel closure (Tsai et al, 2010; Szollosi et al, 2011) has fostered a view of the degenerate site as a simple rigid scaffold, which does not participate in the functional movements of asymmetric ABC-C proteins (although this proposal has remained a matter of contention; Artur et al, 2011). Our present data are hard to reconcile with such an assignment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings provide independent support for the model recently proposed by Tsai et al (2009, 2010), who hypothesized that the NBD dimer only partially separates after ATP hydrolysis. Preliminary ATP binding at NBD1 triggers formation of a tight dimer interface around the inactive composite site 1, which is then maintained during several channel gating cycles (but compare Poletto Chaves and Gadsby, 2011). This proposal is consistent with, and refines, earlier models (Basso et al, 2003; Vergani et al, 2003) in which the conformational changes at the NBDs associated with channel gating occur mainly around site 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%