2008
DOI: 10.1680/macr.2007.00126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External beam–column joints: design to Eurocode 2

Abstract: In practice external beam-column joints are seldom designed for monotonic loading. The current authors believe that this is an oversight which should be addressed. This paper presents a simple strut and tie model for the analysis and design of external reinforced concrete beam-column joints. The strut and tie model is developed from first principles using the concrete design strengths given in Eurocode 2. The main difficulty in developing strut and tie models for beam-column joints is in determining the node d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the post-tensioning compressive force applied to the columns may have assisted the behaviour of the joints, as suggested by Paulay (1989), although counter-evidence exists that questions the existence of this beneficial effect (Kim and LaFave 2007). Besides the aforementioned references, many other studies focus on the seismic behaviour of the beam-column joint (Paulay and Park 1984;Ichinose 1991;Vollum and Newman 1999;Bakir and Boduroglu 2006;Bakir 2003;Vollum and Parker 2008). The columns remained in the elastic range with minor cracking.…”
Section: Overall Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the post-tensioning compressive force applied to the columns may have assisted the behaviour of the joints, as suggested by Paulay (1989), although counter-evidence exists that questions the existence of this beneficial effect (Kim and LaFave 2007). Besides the aforementioned references, many other studies focus on the seismic behaviour of the beam-column joint (Paulay and Park 1984;Ichinose 1991;Vollum and Newman 1999;Bakir and Boduroglu 2006;Bakir 2003;Vollum and Parker 2008). The columns remained in the elastic range with minor cracking.…”
Section: Overall Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Hwang and Lee 55 proposed a strut‐and‐tie equivalent model while Kim and LaFave 65 proposed a joint shear strength and deformation model for different types of RC beam‐column connections based on a statistical analyses of a wide range of experimental tests. For exterior joints, the models proposed by Scott et al 56 and Vollum and Parker 57 based on a single diagonal strut and on a strut‐and‐tie scheme, respectively, are worth mentioning together with the model proposed by Bakir and Boduroğlu, 58 which is based on a statistical fitting approach. More recently, Park and Mosalam 59 proposed a double‐strut mechanical model and Jeon et al 53 proposed a model based on multiple linear regression and advanced machine‐learning methods.…”
Section: Constitutive Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main parameters are selected based on De Risi et al, 9 Celik and Ellingwood, 20 Lowes et al, 36 and Vollum and Parker. 57 The first branch, up to concrete cracking (τ y , γ y ), identifies the joint undamaged elastic response and is followed by the pre-peak branch up to the ultimate state (τ u , γ u ) that corresponds to the joint failure. The critical drift (γ cr ) corresponding to the beginning of concrete spalling is identified by the initial point of the softening branch that ends at the residual strength point (τ R , γ R ).…”
Section: Joint Panel Shear Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Russo and Somma (2006) proposed a theoretical model taking into account the three following contributions to joint shear strength: the vertical stresses transmitted by the column to the concrete, the longitudinal beam reinforcement and the possible passive confinement due to the stirrups into the joint panel. The commonly used strut-and-tie model was revised by Tsonos (2007), while Vollum and Parker (2008) adopted a rotational strut-and-tie model for designing exterior beam-to-column joints. A very recent empirical model useful for evaluating the shear capacity of both unreinforced and reinforced exterior joints has been developed by as an evolution of a previous one proposed by the same authors , in which the ultimate shear strength was evaluated on the basis of the results of a wide experimental database including only reinforced joints.…”
Section: Outline Of the Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%