2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External force estimation and disturbance rejection for Micro Aerial Vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exploration algorithms like the frontier exploration algorithms [15], entropybased algorithms [16], and information-gain algorithms [17] provide a global planning strategy for the MAV, while an additional reactive control layer provides a local obstacle avoidance to prevent collisions with the environment. The most widely used reactive control layer is the artificial potential fields [18], while another approach that has received attention in the last years is the NMPC [19], which has been applied to perform real-time obstacle avoidance for MAVs [20] and disturbance rejection [21]. However, all of these methods consider fixed time steps, while in real-life applications and especially in networked enabled MAVs the feature of a time-varying path planning and a corresponding controller that can take into consideration time variations is vital for collision-free navigation.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exploration algorithms like the frontier exploration algorithms [15], entropybased algorithms [16], and information-gain algorithms [17] provide a global planning strategy for the MAV, while an additional reactive control layer provides a local obstacle avoidance to prevent collisions with the environment. The most widely used reactive control layer is the artificial potential fields [18], while another approach that has received attention in the last years is the NMPC [19], which has been applied to perform real-time obstacle avoidance for MAVs [20] and disturbance rejection [21]. However, all of these methods consider fixed time steps, while in real-life applications and especially in networked enabled MAVs the feature of a time-varying path planning and a corresponding controller that can take into consideration time variations is vital for collision-free navigation.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, vibrations induced by on-board motors or external disturbances caused by wind-gusts acting on the UAV can impact mission performance. Through the use of a gimbal mechanism and an external observer as in [43], external influences can be isolated and avoided. External uncertainties in localization is a primary concern in the field of robotics and can affect mission performance.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KF based estimators may have slow convergence for rapid changes in state, and only consider one measurement for each estimation iteration. Nonlinear Moving Horizon Estimation (NMHE) methods are also getting more attention [17], [18], [19] for their ability to estimate complex nonlinear dynamic models, while they can handle inequality constraints. MHE method uses a moving time window to iteratively estimate the states of a nonlinear dynamic system, providing real-time updates as new measurements become available.…”
Section: A Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%