2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00420-016-1152-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External radiation dose and cancer mortality among French nuclear workers: considering potential confounding by internal radiation exposure

Abstract: This study suggests that in this cohort, neglecting information on internal dosimetry while studying the association between external dose and cancer mortality does not generate a substantial bias. To investigate more specifically the health effects of internal contamination, an effort is underway to estimate organ doses due to internal contamination.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, individual measurements of doses from radionuclide intakes are not available for the cohort members since this data has only recently been systematically collected and centralized in France. A companion paper investigated the potential confounding induced by internal contamination in the doserisk analysis in association with external radiation in the cohort, relying on a work-station exposure matrix (Fournier et al, 2015), and potential for internal contamination will not be considered in the present analysis.…”
Section: Radiation Exposure Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, individual measurements of doses from radionuclide intakes are not available for the cohort members since this data has only recently been systematically collected and centralized in France. A companion paper investigated the potential confounding induced by internal contamination in the doserisk analysis in association with external radiation in the cohort, relying on a work-station exposure matrix (Fournier et al, 2015), and potential for internal contamination will not be considered in the present analysis.…”
Section: Radiation Exposure Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, in vivo and bioassay monitoring results for internal deposition of radionuclides are not available for all cohort members. To address that limit, a previous study on the cohort assessed the potential bias in the estimation of the doserisk relationship due to omitting information on internal contamination (Fournier et al, 2015). Workers at risk of potential internal contamination were identified based on a workstation-exposure matrix.…”
Section: Strengths and Potential Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no centralised and computerised individual data on internal contamination in the cohort, but the potential for internal exposures to confound the external radiation risk has been studied in this cohort using an internal contamination indicator 22. That study concluded that, in this cohort, omitting information on internal contamination while studying the association between external dose and cancer mortality does not generate a substantial bias.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The cohort population has been described elsewhere 22. It comprises all French workers who were employed for at least 1 year by CEA civil or AREVA NC between 1950 and 1994 or by EDF between 1961 and 1994 and who were monitored for external radiation exposure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were excluded for all reviews, books and reports where workers were engaged in their activities for <1 year, and from all articles containing insufficient/incomplete data. Three articles were excluded, although they involved uranium workers and nuclear power (20,24) and uranium gaseous diffusion plants (25), as the radiation doses were closely controlled and were within the range considered as safe. Three articles on the Oak Ridge National Laboratory staff (26,27) and nuclear test participants (28) were also excluded.…”
Section: Data Collection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%