2022
DOI: 10.1111/dom.14867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External validation and extension of the TIMI risk score for heart failure in diabetes for patients with recent acute coronary syndrome: An analysis of the EXAMINE trial

Abstract: Aims:The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Heart Failure (HF) in Diabetes (TRS-HF DM ) prognosticates HF hospitalization in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to externally validate and extend its use for those with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Materials and Methods: The TRS-HF DM was externally validated in the Examination of Cardiovascular Outcomes with Alogliptin versus Standard of Care (EXAMINE) trial (n = 5380) and extended with natriuretic biomarkers. Missing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, TRS-HFDM was well calibrated in intermediate-risk cohorts but showed miscalibration in very high-risk and severe-risk populations. Of note, the addition of NT-proBNP to TRS-HFDM improved the reclassification of PwT2DM at very high CVD risk (Net Reclassification Index, NRI=24%) 34…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, TRS-HFDM was well calibrated in intermediate-risk cohorts but showed miscalibration in very high-risk and severe-risk populations. Of note, the addition of NT-proBNP to TRS-HFDM improved the reclassification of PwT2DM at very high CVD risk (Net Reclassification Index, NRI=24%) 34…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…TRS-HFDM is an integer-based model predicting the 4-year risk of HHF and includes five variables 19. TRS-HFDM was developed and validated in RCTs cohorts with established or at high CVD risk, demonstrating good discrimination (pooled C-statistic=0.75, 95% CI (0.69 to 0.81), 95% PI (0.58 to 0.87), low certainty) 19 32–34. Furthermore, TRS-HFDM was well calibrated in intermediate-risk cohorts but showed miscalibration in very high-risk and severe-risk populations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, other causal proteins may have been missed due to the low detection power in the initial screening step. Lastly, the urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) is a prognostic marker of adverse HF outcomes in patients with ACS with type 2 diabetes 33 , 34 . We have not conducted this analysis because of the missing of UACR in present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many risk models do currently exist for predicting risk of HF in patients with T2DM. [7][8][9][10] However, the majority of these models have been derived from studies that may not reflect real-world population (clinical trial data or prospective studies). For example, the WATCH-DM (Weight [BMI], Age, hyperTension, Creatinine, HDL-C, Diabetes control [fasting plasma glucose], QRS Duration, MI, and CABG) risk score and Risk Equations for Complications of Type 2 Diabetes risk scores were developed using the ACCORD trial (Action to Control Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes), while the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Heart Failure in Diabetes (TRS-HF DM ) was created using the SAVOR-TIMI (Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients With Diabetes-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) 53 study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%