2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External Validation of the Oakland Score to Assess Safe Hospital Discharge Among Adult Patients With Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the US

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB), which manifests as blood in the colon or anorectum, is a common reason for hospitalization. In most patients, LGIB stops spontaneously with no in-hospital intervention. A risk score that could identify patients at low risk of experiencing adverse outcomes could help improve the triage process and allow greater numbers of patients to receive outpatient management of LGIB. OBJECTIVE To externally validate the Oakland Score, which was previously developed using a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
65
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
65
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The Oakland [24] (▶ Table 3) and SHA 2 PE [32] scores have been specifically designed to identify low risk patients. The Oakland score was validated in a retrospective study of 38 067 patients admitted to 140 hospitals in the USA [33]. It comprises seven variables and has been designed to predict "safe discharge," a composite outcome defined as the absence of inhospital rebleeding, RBC transfusion, therapeutic intervention, in-hospital death, and readmission with subsequent LGIB within 28 days.…”
Section: Definition Epidemiology and Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Oakland [24] (▶ Table 3) and SHA 2 PE [32] scores have been specifically designed to identify low risk patients. The Oakland score was validated in a retrospective study of 38 067 patients admitted to 140 hospitals in the USA [33]. It comprises seven variables and has been designed to predict "safe discharge," a composite outcome defined as the absence of inhospital rebleeding, RBC transfusion, therapeutic intervention, in-hospital death, and readmission with subsequent LGIB within 28 days.…”
Section: Definition Epidemiology and Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our multivariable regression analysis, increments in age and comorbidity were associated with an increase in mortality. Both of these variables are well-known risk factors for death and have been incorporated in risk stratification tools in UGIB 37 38 39 . Age > 70 years and more than two comorbidities have been identified as independent predictors of mortality 37 38 39 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GI bleeding-related mortality in these patients is high (up to 8–12 %), but mainly related to patients’ comorbidities. Anticoagulants are independent predictors of neither mortality nor in-hospital rebleeding 202 203 204 205 , provided they are managed appropriately. Temporary discontinuation of anticoagulation is the “standard of care” in patients with clinically significant GI bleeding 206 207 .…”
Section: Acute Gi Haemorrhage On Antiplatelets and Anticoagulantsmentioning
confidence: 99%