External Validity in Randomised Controlled Trials of Acupuncture for Osteoarthritis Knee Pain

Abstract

Objectives To assess two aspects of the external validity of acupuncture research for osteoarthritis knee pain and determine the common acupoints and treatment parameters used. Methods The external validity of 16 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was investigated using a scale consisting of two aspects: reporting and performance. The reporting aspect included acupuncturist's background, study location, treatment detailed, patient characteristics, positive trial results, adverse effects and between-group statistical differences, whereas treatment appropriateness, appropriate controls and outcomes were classifi ed as the performance aspect. Acupuncture treatment in RCTs was compared with common practice according to the literature sources and survey of acupuncturists working in different parts of Thailand. Results The levels of external validity for the reporting and performance aspects were in the range of 31.3% to 100%. Statistic values such as mean difference and confi dence interval were reported by the minority of trials (43.8%). Patient satisfaction and quality of life were seldom used (31.3%). There were minor differences between research and practice in terms of the points used (25.0%), number of treatment sessions (6.3%) and frequency (12.5%). The most frequently used points were ST34, ST35, ST36, SP6, SP9, SP10, GB34, Xiyan and ah shi points, and the commonly used treatment parameters were 20 minutes, 10-15 sessions and two treatments weekly. Conclusions Reporting of the external validity of acupuncture RCTs for knee pain was notably inadequate in terms of trial setting, treatment provider and statistical reporting. The majority of studies involved appropriate controls and outcomes and applied acupuncture treatments in line with practice.

Mast cells are important regulator of acupoint sensitization via the secretion of tryptase, 5-hydroxytryptamine, and histamine

“…The differential increased in the levels of acupoint sensitization of GB34 and EX-LE2, as opposed to that of BL40, are in agreement with the current acupoint selection for knee osteoarthritis in acupuncture [ 27 – 28 ]. In addition, and as mentioned before, the function of acupoints involves being both a reflector of disease severity and a physical point to treating disorders.…”

Risk of bias and methodological issues in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study

“…This is particularly relevant for trials of KOA, since the main outcomes are often patient centred (such as pain, disability, quality of life and global perceived effect) and subjective. 19 …”

Lack of association between acupoint sensitization and microcirculatory structural changes in a mouse model of knee osteoarthritis: A pilot study

“…Therefore, in this study, knee OA was chosen as the carrier for acupoint sensitization. In particular, the treatment of knee OA with acupuncture is primarily through several acupoints (eg, GB34 and ST36) surrounding the knee [38]. These two acupoints were selected as the target acupoints in this study to better clarify the structural changes of microcirculation during acupoint sensitization.…”