2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52099-5_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Externalities, Complexity and Justice: Exploring the New Paradigm of ‘Deliberative Trade Policy’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some costs may not be obvious to audiences such as policy makers, but highly apparent to those bearing these, such as local producers losing market share as a result of more stringent environmental norms. However, extending beyond critiques of simply understanding externalities as 'market failures' (Herrmann-Pillath, 2017), our analysis of mineral supply schemes points to the at least partial intentionality in the invisibilization of these costs. Rather than seeing these costs as being hard to identify due to their intrinsic characteristics, we argue that hidden costs in these schemes are often concealed as their disclosure would expose the narrow and often biased rationality of these solutions, undermine their legitimacy, and consolidate claims for compensation or alternative solutions by cost-bearers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Some costs may not be obvious to audiences such as policy makers, but highly apparent to those bearing these, such as local producers losing market share as a result of more stringent environmental norms. However, extending beyond critiques of simply understanding externalities as 'market failures' (Herrmann-Pillath, 2017), our analysis of mineral supply schemes points to the at least partial intentionality in the invisibilization of these costs. Rather than seeing these costs as being hard to identify due to their intrinsic characteristics, we argue that hidden costs in these schemes are often concealed as their disclosure would expose the narrow and often biased rationality of these solutions, undermine their legitimacy, and consolidate claims for compensation or alternative solutions by cost-bearers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%