2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3341630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Externalities in Knowledge Production: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment

Abstract: Do contributions to online content platforms induce a feedback loop of ever more user-generated content or will they discourage future contributions? To assess this, we use a randomized field experiment which added content to some pages in Wikipedia while leaving similar pages unchanged. We find that adding content has a negligible impact on the subsequent long-run growth of content. Our results have implications for information seeding and incentivizing contributions, implying that additional content does not… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another natural question for further research is whether the additional content spurs additional organic content. This question was addressed in a separate paper that uses the data from the same experiment (Hinnosaar et al, 2020). This paper shows that the added material has a relatively small effect on future content growth, suggesting that edits to user-generated content should be undertaken solely based on their value rather than possible externalities.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another natural question for further research is whether the additional content spurs additional organic content. This question was addressed in a separate paper that uses the data from the same experiment (Hinnosaar et al, 2020). This paper shows that the added material has a relatively small effect on future content growth, suggesting that edits to user-generated content should be undertaken solely based on their value rather than possible externalities.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%