2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extinction Learning in Humans

Abstract: Understanding how fears are acquired is an important step in translating basic research to the treatment of fear-related disorders. However, understanding how learned fears are diminished may be even more valuable. We explored the neural mechanisms of fear extinction in humans. Studies of extinction in nonhuman animals have focused on two interconnected brain regions: the amygdala and the ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Consistent with animal models suggesting that the amygdala is important for both … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

50
688
3
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,584 publications
(746 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
50
688
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In short, emotional stimuli provoke an increase in the amygdala's reactivity, which overwhelms the inhibitory activity in prefrontal top‐down control regions, resulting in an impaired capacity of individuals to self‐regulate. This mechanism, which echoes the basic neuroanatomy of fear‐conditioning (LeDoux, 2000; Phelps, Delgado, Nearing, & LeDoux, 2004), likely contributes to increased risk for later psychological disorders like PTSD and major depression (Shin & Liberzon, 2010). However, this mechanism of dysregulated amygdala activity has previously been studied without taking into account the often‐reported broader cognitive deficits in executive functions that are seen in many individuals exposed to I‐ELT (van der Kolk, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In short, emotional stimuli provoke an increase in the amygdala's reactivity, which overwhelms the inhibitory activity in prefrontal top‐down control regions, resulting in an impaired capacity of individuals to self‐regulate. This mechanism, which echoes the basic neuroanatomy of fear‐conditioning (LeDoux, 2000; Phelps, Delgado, Nearing, & LeDoux, 2004), likely contributes to increased risk for later psychological disorders like PTSD and major depression (Shin & Liberzon, 2010). However, this mechanism of dysregulated amygdala activity has previously been studied without taking into account the often‐reported broader cognitive deficits in executive functions that are seen in many individuals exposed to I‐ELT (van der Kolk, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Before discarding any data, adequacy of conditioning was examined as defined by CS+ > CS− during conditioning, and CS+ during conditioning >CS+ during habituation (Asthana et al., 2013; Mungee et al., 2014, 2016; Phelps et al., 2004; van ‘t Wout et al., 2013). Following this definition, five participants did not condition appropriately and were removed from subsequent analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal models and human studies of PTSD have highlighted aberrations in neural circuitry including hyperactivity in the amygdala and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, regions that promote fear responses, alongside hypoactivity in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), a region that is thought to suppress fear responses (Milad & Quirk, 2012; Quirk, Garcia, & González‐Lima, 2006; VanElzakker et al., 2014). More specifically, vmPFC engagement during extinction learning predicts extinction success and is associated with “top‐down” modulation of amygdala‐driven fear expression (Do‐Monte, Manzano‐Nieves, Quiñones‐Laracuente, Ramos‐Medina, & Quirk, 2015; Lebrón, Milad, & Quirk, 2004; Milad et al., 2005, 2007; Phelps, Delgado, Nearing, & LeDoux, 2004; Quirk, Likhtik, Pelletier, & Paré, 2003; Rosenkranz, Moore, & Grace, 2003). Results from studies with PTSD patients revealed deficits in extinction recall (Milad et al., 2008), reduced vmPFC volume, and activation during fear extinction compared to controls (Bremner et al., 2005; Milad et al., 2009; Rauch et al., 2003; Rougemont‐Bücking et al., 2011; Shin, Rauch, & Pitman, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous CS-UCS parings (100%) usually results in rapid acquisition, but also in rapid extinction in human participants (LaBar, Gatenby, Gore, LeDoux, & Phelps, 1998). Therefore, a partial reinforcement schedule was chosen to decrease extinction learning (Phelps, Delgado, Nearing, & LeDoux, 2004) and, thereby, allow us to examine the impact of fear acquisition in a test phase where no more US were presented (see Alpers, Ruhleder, Walz, Mühlberger, & Pauli, 2005). Trials were separated by inter-trial-intervals (ITIs) ranging from 20 s to 35 s. During five ITIs in each block, a startle probe was delivered with inter-probe-intervals of at least 15 s. During fear conditioning, SCRs and startle eyeblink responses were measured as physiological indices of fear acquisition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%