1991
DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(91)90063-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extra-dimensional versus intra-dimensional set shifting performance following frontal lobe excisions, temporal lobe excisions or amygdalo-hippocampectomy in man

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

28
422
3
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 625 publications
(455 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
28
422
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have uncovered impairments in fear conditioning [44], startle reflex priming [43], response modulation [47], linguistic processing [70], and autonomic responding to distress cues [15]. Drawing on these findings and others, researchers have suggested that psychopathy is the result of deficits in systems mediating fear [44,45,50], response modulation [46], general affective processing [34], or empathy [9]. However, the individual explanations tend to address only a limited number of phenomena, and despite some overlap, the theories do not explain the entire spectrum of empirical findings and traits associated with the disorder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies have uncovered impairments in fear conditioning [44], startle reflex priming [43], response modulation [47], linguistic processing [70], and autonomic responding to distress cues [15]. Drawing on these findings and others, researchers have suggested that psychopathy is the result of deficits in systems mediating fear [44,45,50], response modulation [46], general affective processing [34], or empathy [9]. However, the individual explanations tend to address only a limited number of phenomena, and despite some overlap, the theories do not explain the entire spectrum of empirical findings and traits associated with the disorder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to indexing response reversal performance, the task also includes a separate ED set-shift component requiring the participant to attend to some aspect of the stimulus that did not predict reward or punishment on earlier trials. Whereas impaired response reversal performance is associated with lesions of the OFC [56,58,59], extra-dimensional shift dysfunction is associated with damage to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [50,23]. Moreover, these abilities to perform extra-dimensional shifts have been shown to be clearly doubly dissociable in both animal lesion studies as well as human neuropsychological work [23,50,56,58,59].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In primates, the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) mediates the ability to shift attention between perceptual features of complex stimuli (Dias et al, 1996(Dias et al, , 1997Owen et al, 1991), and in rats, it has been implicated specifically in attentional set-shifting, or the ability to 'unlearn' an established contingency in order to learn a new one by shifting attention from a previously salient stimulus dimension to a previously irrelevant one (Birrell and Brown, 2000). Lesions of rat mPFC resulted in a state of 'emotional perseveration', or a failure to unlearn old contingencies in a fear-conditioning extinction paradigm (Morgan et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible deleterious effects of marijuana use on cognitive flexibility, a cardinal feature of the primate prefrontal cortex (PFC) (Dias et al, 1996a;Owen et al, 1991), may be of particular importance; inflexibility in attentional and affective control may be deleterious to intellectual and social functioning (Pope and YurgelunTodd, 1996), and may underlie perseveration to continued drug administration (Bolla et al, 2002;Jentsch and Taylor, 1999;Volkow and Fowler, 2000). While some studies have indicated that impairments in mental flexibility persist after approximately 1 day (Pope and Yurgelun-Todd, 1996) and 28 days of abstinence from marijuana (Bolla et al, 2002), other studies performed at similar time points have yielded negative or minimal results (Fletcher et al, 1996;Pope et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%