1996
DOI: 10.1097/00008469-199606000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extra low frequency electric and magnetic fields in the bedplace of children diagnosed with leukaemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 4, the overall mean percentage of children exposed to ≥0.3 μT for all studies was 2.0%, with a range from 0 to 7.0% 57–74. The PAR% in the best‐guess scenario was 1.9%, which means that about 2% of the CL incidence in the population might be attributable to ELF‐EMF exposure.…”
Section: Impactmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Table 4, the overall mean percentage of children exposed to ≥0.3 μT for all studies was 2.0%, with a range from 0 to 7.0% 57–74. The PAR% in the best‐guess scenario was 1.9%, which means that about 2% of the CL incidence in the population might be attributable to ELF‐EMF exposure.…”
Section: Impactmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The estimation of the proportions of exposed children were based on the studies included in the pooled analyses of Greenland et al 6. and Kheifets et al .,7 because both pooled analyses used the same exposure categories (0.1–0.2 μT, 0.2–0.3 μT and ≥0.3 μT) 57–74. For the estimation of population exposure, we used control group exposure and grouped studies based on country or region.…”
Section: Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of studies used 24-h measurements to assess residential exposure (London et al, 1991;Linet et al, 1997;Dockerty et al, 1998;Michaelis et al, 1998). Two studies performed spot measurements (Tomenius, 1986;Savitz et al, 1988) and one study assessed exposure only during night time (Coghill et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electric fields (EF) were not evaluated since published results on the possible effects are anecdotal and mostly did not show positive associations (cf. Savitz et al, 1988;London et al, 1991;Coghill et al, 1996;Dockerty et al, 1998;Green et al, 1999;McBride et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%