2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72706-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracellular vesicles shuttle protective messages against heat stress in bovine granulosa cells

Abstract: Elevated summer temperature is reported to be the leading cause of stress in dairy and beef cows, which negatively affects various reproductive functions. Follicular cells respond to heat stress (HS) by activating the expression of heat shock family proteins (HSPs) and other antioxidants. HS is reported to negatively affect the bi-directional communication between the follicular cells and the oocyte, which is partly mediated by follicular fluid extracellular vesicles (EVs) released from surrounding cells. As c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(96 reference statements)
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, it is still unclear whether bystander effects are beneficial, natural defence mechanisms triggered by stressors and mediated by compounds originating from stressed cells or, rather, if they induce deleterious modifications in recipient cells. It is possible that exposure to EVs from stressed cells leads to a higher level of stress in recipient bystander cells, but it also induces more resistance and robustness against subsequent stress, making the bystander effect an adaptive response [ 61 , 124 , 125 , 126 ]. Understanding the molecular mechanisms and signalling pathways of bystander effects and the exact role of EVs in this process is important for a better understanding and estimation of cancer risks and other health consequences associated with ionising radiation exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, it is still unclear whether bystander effects are beneficial, natural defence mechanisms triggered by stressors and mediated by compounds originating from stressed cells or, rather, if they induce deleterious modifications in recipient cells. It is possible that exposure to EVs from stressed cells leads to a higher level of stress in recipient bystander cells, but it also induces more resistance and robustness against subsequent stress, making the bystander effect an adaptive response [ 61 , 124 , 125 , 126 ]. Understanding the molecular mechanisms and signalling pathways of bystander effects and the exact role of EVs in this process is important for a better understanding and estimation of cancer risks and other health consequences associated with ionising radiation exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, heat stress-related EVs induced adaptive responses in cultured bovine granulosa cells exposed to heat shock. This observation was evidenced by improved granulosa cell viability and decreased ROS accumulation and was mediated through transfer of HSP90, HSP70, NRF2, antioxidants, and several other microRNAs [121,122].…”
Section: Heat-shockmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Real-time PCR reaction was conducted using Maxima SYBR Green/ROX qPCR Master Mix (Thermofisher Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania) in a StepOnePlus instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) in a reaction mixture (20 µL) consisting of 10 µL of SYBR green with ROX, 7.8 µL of nuclease-free water, 0.2 µL of specific-reverse primer, 0.2 µL of specific-forward primer, and 2 µL of the cDNA sample. The reaction conditions were as follows: 50 • C for 2 min, initial denaturation at 95 • C for 10 min, then 40 PCR cycles consisting of 15 s for denaturation at 95 • C, 1 min for annealing at 60 • C, and 30 s for extension at 72 • C; while 5 min for final extension at 72 • C. Data of gene expression were analyzed using the delta-delta Ct method and reported as relative transcript abundance after normalization to the housekeeping gene Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) according to Khan et al 2020 [14] and Gebremedhn et al [15].…”
Section: Quantitative Real-time Pcr (Qrt-pcr)mentioning
confidence: 99%