2020
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.14624
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extrachromosomal DNA amplicons in antimalarial‐resistant Plasmodium falciparum

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, allele frequencies from the two parts of the locus were uncorrelated across MAL (mean pairwise R 2 adj=-0.01, linear models; In light of these patterns, we hypothesized that common var polymorphisms were not generated de novo during the MA experiment, but instead maintained on extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) inherited from ANC with stochastic loss (Fig 2C). ecDNA is ubiquitous in eukaryotes 12 and has been reported in one P. falciparum study to date, where it was implicated in selective amplification of a drug-resistance gene 13 . We performed molecular experiments to quantify var polymorphism and test the ecDNA hypothesis, again focusing on the most polymorphic internal locus on chr12.…”
Section: D7 Reference Chromosomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, allele frequencies from the two parts of the locus were uncorrelated across MAL (mean pairwise R 2 adj=-0.01, linear models; In light of these patterns, we hypothesized that common var polymorphisms were not generated de novo during the MA experiment, but instead maintained on extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) inherited from ANC with stochastic loss (Fig 2C). ecDNA is ubiquitous in eukaryotes 12 and has been reported in one P. falciparum study to date, where it was implicated in selective amplification of a drug-resistance gene 13 . We performed molecular experiments to quantify var polymorphism and test the ecDNA hypothesis, again focusing on the most polymorphic internal locus on chr12.…”
Section: D7 Reference Chromosomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DSM1 EC50 values are as follows: L1 (1 µM), L2 (0.9 µM), M1 (7.2 µM), H2 (85 µM), H6 (56 µM), H4 (49 µM). All values were previously reported and clone names were adapted as previously (11,36). (B) Relationship between GCH1 and DHODH copy number in DSM1 selected parasites as quantified using short read data from Guler et al 2013.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We diluted the digested DNA for ddPCR reactions. We performed ddPCR using ddPCR Supermix for Probe (no dUTP, Bio-Rad Laboratories, California, USA) with DNA input 0.1 ng (in duplicate per sample), 0.025 ng (in duplicate per sample) as previously described (McDaniels et al, 2021). The primers and probes used in reactions are included in Supplementary Table 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because prior P. falciparum CNV analyses were confined to bulk DNA sequencing, our view of minor variants in parasite populations is limited. The recent discovery of P. falciparum extrachromosomal DNA that is derived from regions of the genome that harbor CNVs [125] suggests that there are cellular pathways that could contribute to cell-to-cell variations in CNV boundaries and dynamics (i.e., perhaps through the excision and reintegration of extrachromosomal DNA). While the differences in start position of true CNVs from single-cell genomes (Tables 4 and 5) could represent true minor variants, they could also be due to analysis artifacts that contribute to excess CNV calls and inaccuracies in estimating boundaries.…”
Section: Cnv Analysis and Related Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%