2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.04.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Pediatric Cardiac Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
65
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, survival for ECPR in HLHS patients is generally lower than the 40-55% ECPR survival reported for cardiac patients with a broad range of diagnosis and including postoperative and nonoperative patients (7,9,14,15). The decreased survival outcomes for ECMO in HLHS neonates following S1P may reflect patient and ECMO management challenges specific to this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, survival for ECPR in HLHS patients is generally lower than the 40-55% ECPR survival reported for cardiac patients with a broad range of diagnosis and including postoperative and nonoperative patients (7,9,14,15). The decreased survival outcomes for ECMO in HLHS neonates following S1P may reflect patient and ECMO management challenges specific to this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Thus, generalizing these findings to children with HLHS undergoing S1P may be difficult. Current single-center reports of survival following ECPR in HLHS patients following S1P report variable survival outcomes (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Because cardiac arrest and use of ECPR in neonates with HLHS undergoing S1P is commonplace and maintaining an ECPR program is expensive, improving our understanding of potential benefits, namely survival to discharge, morbidity, and long-term outcomes in this population, is critical.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, duration of CPR was identified as is a strong predictor of survival in a recent large, singlecenter study (15 min survivors vs. 40 min non-survivors, P=0.009), in which children who required ≥30 min of CPR had 79% reduced odds of hospital survival (24). Several single-center published reports do not identify duration of CPR as a predictor of ECPR survival but the difference in median duration of CPR between survivors and nonsurvivors was generally small (<5 min) (25)(26)(27). In contrast, pre-ECLS resuscitation >30 minutes has been identified as a significant independent risk factor of mortality in adults who experience out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (28).…”
Section: Duration Of Pre-ecpr Resuscitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morris et al 32 Paden et al 2 Polimenakos et al 26 Prodhan et al 27 Raymond et al 8 Shah et al 33 Sivarajan et al 34 Thiagarajan et al 6 Tajik and Cardarelli 7 Wolf et al 24 Thourani et al 25 630 (40) 8 (57) 24 (72) 87 (44) 9 (33) 14 (38) 261 (38) 114 ( survive after treatment with ECPR. 8 Few published data support preexisting measurements as indicators for survival.…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, survival statistics for ECPR are more encouraging, with a general rate of success of near 40% to 60%. [2][3][4][5][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Multi-institutional data obtained in 2012 from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO), an international registry and database of ECMO treatment, demonstrated that ECPR was successful for 934 out of 2236 neonatal and pediatric patients, with survival to discharge of 39% for neonates and 40% for children. Other retrospective, single-institution studies have shown survival rates as high as 72% to 80%.…”
Section: The Benefits Of Ecprmentioning
confidence: 99%