ObjectiveThis study aims to compare three different surgical approaches for combined
coronary and carotid artery stenosis as a single stage procedure and to
assess effect of operative strategy on mortality and neurological
complications.MethodsThis retrospective study involves 136 patients who had synchronous coronary
artery revascularization and carotid endarterectomy in our institution,
between January 2002 and December 2012. Patients were divided into 3 groups
according to the surgical technique used. Group I included 70 patients who
had carotid endarterectomy, followed by coronary revascularization with
on-pump technique, group II included 29 patients who had carotid
endarterectomy, followed by coronary revascularization with off-pump
technique, group III included 37 patients who had coronary revascularization
with on-pump technique followed by carotid endarterectomy under aortic
cross-clamp and systemic hypothermia (22-27ºC). Postoperative outcomes were
evaluated.ResultsOverall early mortality and stroke rate was 5.1% for both. There were 3
(4.3%) deaths in group I, 2 (6.9%) deaths in group II and 2 (5.4%) deaths in
group III. Stroke was observed in 5 (7.1%) patients in group I and 2 (6.9%)
in group II. Stroke was not observed in group III. No statistically
significant difference was observed for mortality and stroke rates among the
groups.ConclusionWe identified no significant difference in mortality or neurologic
complications among three approaches for synchronous surgery for coronary
and carotid disease. Therefore it is impossible to conclude that a single
principle might be adapted into standard practice. Patient specific risk
factors and clinical conditions might be important in determining the
surgical tecnnique.