2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracorporeal life support and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a nationwide registry: A propensity score-matched analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
92
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
92
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For patients undergoing ECPR following OHCA, the observed overall rate of PCI (26.3%) was lower than that previously reported by Kagawa [22] (88%), Yannopoulos [15] (67%), Avalli [2] (61%), Sakamoto [13] (54.8%), Stub [14] (42%), Bellezzo [3] (40%), Maekawa [11] (39.6%), Kagawa [9] (38%), and Choi [4] (31%). While the retrospective nature of this study cannot assess causation, there was no significant difference in survival between patients who underwent PCI (28.1%) and those who did not (27.5%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…For patients undergoing ECPR following OHCA, the observed overall rate of PCI (26.3%) was lower than that previously reported by Kagawa [22] (88%), Yannopoulos [15] (67%), Avalli [2] (61%), Sakamoto [13] (54.8%), Stub [14] (42%), Bellezzo [3] (40%), Maekawa [11] (39.6%), Kagawa [9] (38%), and Choi [4] (31%). While the retrospective nature of this study cannot assess causation, there was no significant difference in survival between patients who underwent PCI (28.1%) and those who did not (27.5%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Therefore, generalisability of these findings is limited. Although two studies include over 100 patients undergoing ECPR, both studies did not evaluate the association between survival and the time from arrest to ECPR …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the cost/benefit of eCPR compared to conventional CPR is not known, as most studies are retrospective 10,17,18 or observational, 8,11 and few control for or describe cannulation techniques or post-cannulation management; 6 as such, there is a profound knowledge gap around the absolute benefit, use appropriateness and ideal patient management of eCPR, which may lead to inappropriate use and outcome disparities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%