Article assessedPeek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, et al. Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 374: 1351-63.
Critical care issueSevere adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains associated with high mortality despite improved ventilatory techniques. While extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is not uncommon in neonatal/pediatric critical care, studies had yet to show similar benefits in adults. Therefore, the Conventional Ventilation or ECMO for Severe Adult Respiratory Failure (CESAR) Trial by Peek et al. 1 was eagerly anticipated. It was the first randomized study of ECMO in adult patients in over 15 yr and the largest ever concerning this condition. 2
Summary and key findingsIn this multicentre randomized control trial from the United Kingdom, 180 patients, aged 18-65 yr, were analyzed. The patients had severe but potentially reversible respiratory failure, a Murray Score of C 3.0 (determined by combining PaO 2 /F I 0 2 ratio, positive end expiratory pressure level, lung compliance, chest radiograph appearance, and F I 0 2 of 1.0), or uncompensated hypercapnea (pH \ 7.2) despite conventional treatment. They were randomized 1:1 to conventional management without transfer vs transfer to one site and consideration of ECMO. A greater proportion of patients randomized to consideration of ECMO were alive at six months compared with patients randomized to conventional management (63% or 57/90 vs 50% or 45/90, respectively). This outcome did not reach statistical significance (relative risk 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.52-1.03]; P = 0.07). However, a significantly greater percentage of patients randomized to consideration of ECMO survived to six months without severe disability compared with patients randomized to conventional management (63% [57/90] vs 47% [41/87], respectively; relative risk 0.69; 95% CI [0.05-0.97]; P = 0.03). Referral for ECMO consideration was associated with 0.03 quality-adjusted years (QALYS) at six months. The cost per QALY for ECMO was 19,252 pounds sterling (GBP) (95% CI [7,200]). Despite conventional management, the authors concluded that it was appropriate to transfer adults with severe ARDS to a centre with an ECMO-based management protocol.
Critical appraisalCurrent state of the literature and study relevance Extra corporeal membrane oxygenation is accepted as a standard-of-care for neonates and children with progressive respiratory and/or cardiac failure refractory to conventional management. [1][2][3] In contrast, adult ECMO is currently confined to a few specialized centres and reserved for exceptional cases. This is because of increased cost and logistics but also because of disappointing results from the two previous randomized trials. 4,5