2023
DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000003164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference

Abstract: To systematically review and assimilate literature on children receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) with the goal of developing an update to the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference recommendations and statements about clinical practice and research.DATA SOURCES: Electronic searches of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), and CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost). STUDY SELECTION:The search used a medical subject heading terms and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were another 112 statements: 18 related to the definition of PARDS and patients at risk for PARDS, 55 GPS, seven PS, and 32 RS. The evidence tables and rationale supporting CR are presented in the corresponding subgroup manuscripts (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There were another 112 statements: 18 related to the definition of PARDS and patients at risk for PARDS, 55 GPS, seven PS, and 32 RS. The evidence tables and rationale supporting CR are presented in the corresponding subgroup manuscripts (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 8. Extracorporeal Support (21) Indications for Extracorporeal Support in PARDS. Clinical recommendation 8.1.1.…”
Section: Delirium Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We developed Patient/Intervention/Comparator/ Outcome (PICO) questions specific to each topic, which are described in each of the articles in this supplement (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Although writing the manuscript, the authors reviewed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and scoping reviews, as applicable (18,19).…”
Section: Systematic Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%