2015
DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plu085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extractable nitrogen and microbial community structure respond to grassland restoration regardless of historical context and soil composition

Abstract: Exotic plants have the capacity to establish positive plant-soil feedbacks facilitating invader persistence often at the cost of native plant species success. We compared the plant communities, soil chemical and microbial communities and nutrient turnover rates between invaded and restored plots in inland and coastal grasslands. Greater extractable N, slower N cycling rates and differing microbial community composition resulted from restoration. These differences indicate that grassland soils are responsive to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether and how soil microbial communities recover following human land use and active restoration efforts remains an open question (Harris, 2009) and our study adds to accumulating evidence that restoration actions manipulating ecosystem structure and plant diversity (directly or indirectly) also affect soil microbial communities (Banning et al, 2011;Barber et al, 2017;Dickens, Allen, Santiago, & Crowley, 2015;Potthoff et al, 2006). We further illustrate the potential for restoration to benefit soil microbes across sites supporting different land-use histories.…”
Section: Implications For Managementmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Whether and how soil microbial communities recover following human land use and active restoration efforts remains an open question (Harris, 2009) and our study adds to accumulating evidence that restoration actions manipulating ecosystem structure and plant diversity (directly or indirectly) also affect soil microbial communities (Banning et al, 2011;Barber et al, 2017;Dickens, Allen, Santiago, & Crowley, 2015;Potthoff et al, 2006). We further illustrate the potential for restoration to benefit soil microbes across sites supporting different land-use histories.…”
Section: Implications For Managementmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Any significant differences in the abundance of AOB, nitrogen turnover rates, or the levels of soil microbial biomass carbon can be directly attributed to changes in stand volume over time, and not solely differences in soil moisture content (Zak et al ; Dickens et al ). Wood accumulation rates slowed within the maturing pine patches as trees shifted from height growth and radial increment to only slow radial accumulations (Oliver & Larson ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Illuminating the spatial patterns of microorganisms in a grassland ecosystem not only helps to predict the critical processes that occur within grasslands (e.g. grassland degradation and restoration) but also helps to build a more comprehensive microbial biogeographic pattern at a larger scale 9,10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%