2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10943-012-9668-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting Dirt From Water: A Strengths-Based Approach to Religion for African American Same-Gender-Loving Men

Abstract: Religion is one of the most powerful and ubiquitous forces in African American same-gender-loving (SGL) men's lives. Research indicates that it has both positive and negative influences on the health behaviors and outcomes of this population. This paper presents a review of the literature that examines religion as a risk and protective factor for African American SGL men. A strengths-based approach to religion that aims to utilize its protective qualities and weaken its relation to risk is proposed. Finally, r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spirituality is also an important factor in many LGBT people’s lives [12, 13] and encompasses one’s personal connection with her or his higher power(s). Religion and spirituality are also significantly associated with several mental and physical health outcomes [14] and can function as both risk and protective factors for negative health outcomes [15]. The duality of religion and spirituality is a significant aspect of these forces and more research is needed to understand how to maximize their health inducing qualities and minimize the deleterious ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spirituality is also an important factor in many LGBT people’s lives [12, 13] and encompasses one’s personal connection with her or his higher power(s). Religion and spirituality are also significantly associated with several mental and physical health outcomes [14] and can function as both risk and protective factors for negative health outcomes [15]. The duality of religion and spirituality is a significant aspect of these forces and more research is needed to understand how to maximize their health inducing qualities and minimize the deleterious ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While fewer Black SM men have reported attending formal religious services on a weekly basis compared to their Black heterosexual counterparts (22.1% vs. 47%; Lassiter, 2016), religion is still viewed as an important phenomenon by this group (Lassiter et al, 2017; Pitt, 2010; Quinn & Dickson-Gomez, 2016; Quinn, Dickson-Gomez, & Kelly, 2016; Quinn, Dikson-Gomez, & Young, 2016; Taylor et al, 2003). Black SM men have reported being involved in the full range of church roles and activities including pulpit ministry, choir direction, and other ministerial duties (Garrett-Walker & Torres, 2017; Lassiter, 2014; Woodyard, Peterson, & Stokes, 2000). Black SM men are often important parts of their religious communities and receive essential fortifying benefits as a result of their religious participation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequent exposure to homonegative religious messages may be one reason that some Black SM men do not readily disclose their sexual orientation to others (Nelson et al, 2017). Exposure to homonegative religious messages can contribute to an internal conflict between the religious and sexual identities of Black SM men that make it harder to share their sexual orientation with others (Appleby, 2001; Foster et al, 2011; Lassiter, 2014). In fact, some Black SM men who do not disclose their sexual orientation to their church members may avoid attending religious services (Lassiter, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We added five additional terms that were not used in any search. These are terms we have seen used in LGBT health research: “same gender loving” [ 36 ], “same sex couple” [ 37 ], “same sex couples” [ 38 ], “sexual and gender minority” [ 39 ], and its plural version, “sexual and gender minorities.” This full list of 82 terms is presented below with bolded terms coming from the identified reviews and italicized terms added based on their use in the field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%