2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.07.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting features from online software reviews to aid requirements reuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Villarroel et al introduced CLAP to prioritize the clusters of reviews for supporting released planning of apps . Bakara et al proposed a semiautomated approach FENL to extract features for initiating the requirements reuse process . Summarizing the information aims at helping developers understand the main information from large number of reviews, a number of tools are given to achieve this goal, such as WisCom and SUR‐Miner .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Villarroel et al introduced CLAP to prioritize the clusters of reviews for supporting released planning of apps . Bakara et al proposed a semiautomated approach FENL to extract features for initiating the requirements reuse process . Summarizing the information aims at helping developers understand the main information from large number of reviews, a number of tools are given to achieve this goal, such as WisCom and SUR‐Miner .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Bakara et al proposed a semiautomated approach FENL to extract features for initiating the requirements reuse process. 25 Summarizing the information aims at helping developers understand the main information from large number of reviews, a number of tools are given to achieve this goal, such as WisCom 26 and SUR-Miner. 27 These research works can help developers analyze reviews efficiently to gain valuable information, but none of them establishes relationships between such information and domain knowledge so they could only achieve limited effect in supporting the domain analysis of apps.…”
Section: Review Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors proposed incorporating customer preference information into feature models based on sentiment analysis of user-generated online product reviews [10]. A semi-automated approach was proposed to extract phrases that can represent software features from software reviews as a way to initiate the requirement reuse process [11].…”
Section: Requirements Evolution Prediction Through Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table (a) shows the results by analyzing reviews from 60 Apps in the domain “Social” by LDA. It can be seen that most of words in T0 (Message), T1 (Friend), and T6 (Video) are related to App features, for example, there are only 2 words “day” and “month” in top 10 words of T0 (Message) irrelative to App features; while the situation is opposite in other topics T2 (Ad) to T5 (App), for instance, only 1 word “Photo” in top 10 words of T5 (App) is related to App features, but others are about the sentiments on the product. Other methods try to extract App features from reviews before summarizing them for gaining information that is more related to the features . However, as App features may be expressed by the users with different vocabularies in reviews, it is difficult to extract them accurately: The precisions of these methods are usually about 60% or even lower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Other methods try to extract App features from reviews before summarizing them for gaining information that is more related to the features. [15][16][17] However, as App features may be expressed by the users with different vocabularies in reviews, it is difficult to extract them accurately: The precisions of these methods are usually about 60% or even lower.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%