2022
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2022.3208454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting Glacier Calving Fronts by Deep Learning: The Benefit of Multispectral, Topographic, and Textural Input Features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many methods are based on the U-Net (Ronneberger et al, 2015). One approach is to segment the images into different areas and extract the calving front as the border between segmentation areas (Hartmann et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2019;Baumhoer et al, 2019;Periyasamy et al, 2022;Loebel et al, 2022). Another approach directly trains a model on the position of the calving front (Davari et al, 2022).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods are based on the U-Net (Ronneberger et al, 2015). One approach is to segment the images into different areas and extract the calving front as the border between segmentation areas (Hartmann et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2019;Baumhoer et al, 2019;Periyasamy et al, 2022;Loebel et al, 2022). Another approach directly trains a model on the position of the calving front (Davari et al, 2022).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…time series generation. Deep neural networks demonstrated their superior performance for calving front detection in several studies in means of speed and still achieve accuracies better or comparable to manual delineations [21][22][23][29][30][31] . Nevertheless, occasional failures occur where incorrect front positions are extracted due to icebergs, mélange, surface melt or cloud cover.…”
Section: Post-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IceLines is validated by calculating the distance difference between the automatically extracted daily fronts and manual front delineations. This is a commonly applied method to assess the accuracy of the derived front positions 21,23,31 . Nevertheless, manual front delineation is a very challenging task and underlies a high degree of subjectivity.…”
Section: Technical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further progress in this field was made by extending the UNet model or exploiting the advances of more recent segmentation model architectures. For example, Loebel et al [13] add more layers and thereby increase the number of down-and upsampling steps. This enlarges the spatial context that the network can consider for its decisions and therefore leads to better predictions.…”
Section: A Detecting Calving Fronts In the Deep Learning Eramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to thoroughly evaluate our model and compare it with other approaches, we choose two large-scale datasets of marine-terminating glaciers in Greenland for training and evaluation purposes, namely the CALFIN dataset [4] and the calving front dataset from TU Dresden (TUD) [13]. Both of these datasets include respective testing data.…”
Section: A Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%