Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue 2016
DOI: 10.18653/v1/w16-3615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting PDTB Discourse Relations from Student Essays

Abstract: We investigate the manual and automatic annotation of PDTB discourse relations in student essays, a novel domain that is not only learning-based and argumentative, but also noisy with surface errors and deeper coherency issues. We discuss methodological complexities it poses for the task. We present descriptive statistics and compare relation distributions in related corpora. We compare automatic discourse parsing performance to prior work.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was done in two steps. Following Forbes-Riley et al (2016), in the first step, we measured type agreement. Type agreement is defined as the number of common DRs over the number of unique relations, where all discourse relations are of the same type.…”
Section: Additional Sense Tagsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was done in two steps. Following Forbes-Riley et al (2016), in the first step, we measured type agreement. Type agreement is defined as the number of common DRs over the number of unique relations, where all discourse relations are of the same type.…”
Section: Additional Sense Tagsmentioning
confidence: 99%