2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6471/aa9422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting the σ-term from low-energy pion-nucleon scattering

Abstract: Abstract. We present an extraction of the pion-nucleon (πN ) scattering lengths from low-energy πN scattering, by fitting a representation based on RoySteiner equations to the low-energy data base. We show that the resulting values confirm the scattering-length determination from pionic atoms, and discuss the stability of the fit results regarding electromagnetic corrections and experimental normalization uncertainties in detail. Our results provide further evidence for a large πN σ-term, σ πN = 58(5) MeV, in … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7. There is tension between the lattice result [42] ΣπN = 40(4) MeV, and phenomenological extractions ΣπN = 59.1(3.5) MeV and ΣπN = 58(5) MeV from pionic atoms[49] and low energy pion-nucleon scattering[50]. Since the scalar matrix elements of u and d quarks represent a small contribution to the total cross section[16], our results would be essentially unchanged if a larger value, ΣπN ≈ 60 MeV, were used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…7. There is tension between the lattice result [42] ΣπN = 40(4) MeV, and phenomenological extractions ΣπN = 59.1(3.5) MeV and ΣπN = 58(5) MeV from pionic atoms[49] and low energy pion-nucleon scattering[50]. Since the scalar matrix elements of u and d quarks represent a small contribution to the total cross section[16], our results would be essentially unchanged if a larger value, ΣπN ≈ 60 MeV, were used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Notably we get f π = 93 MeV with DSE1 and Eq. ( 10). In DSE4, we take the same parameter values as in DSE1.…”
Section: Numerical Calculations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can notice easily from Fig. 3 [8][9][10], from chiral perturbation theory (red) [13][14][15], from Lattice QCD (magenta ) [18][19][20]22], from various other models (blue) [25,26,28] and from the DSE(green) approach [24].…”
Section: Numerical Calculations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations