2017
DOI: 10.4188/jte.63.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction of 3D Curved Tight and Flared Skirt Shape Features Using Angle Curvatures

Abstract: The 3D curved surface shapes of tight and flared skirts were predicted precisely by the angle curvatures (concentrated Gaussian curvature Kc, concentrated geodesic curvature kc, and concentrated mean curvature Hc), model sizes, skirt designs, and fabrics. All of the 72 skirts, encompassing 3 female body models (mean body sizes of Japanese women in their 20s, 40s, and 70s), 6 kinds of fabrics, tight skirts, and 3 kinds of flared skirts, were investigated with attention to the differences of the curved surface s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) The 72 3D skirts are constructed by 3 Japanese women in their 20s, 40s, and 70s body models [8][9][10], 6 kinds of fabrics (cotton broad (A), tropical wool (B), tropical polyester (C), cotton toile (D), polyester single-yarn twill (E) and polyester faille (F)), with a total 12 skirt patterns for the 4 skirt styles, (tight, flare 1, flare 2, and flare 3 skirts) in previous paper [11], as shown in appendix 2) The sensitivity images' DEn for the 72 skirt photographs (scale of 1 to 7), as shown in Table 2 and Fig. 1, are evaluated for the fabric curved shape images of DE1 to DE5 using the semantic differential (SD) method and the design curved shape images of DE6 to DE11 using the five-grade evaluation system method.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1) The 72 3D skirts are constructed by 3 Japanese women in their 20s, 40s, and 70s body models [8][9][10], 6 kinds of fabrics (cotton broad (A), tropical wool (B), tropical polyester (C), cotton toile (D), polyester single-yarn twill (E) and polyester faille (F)), with a total 12 skirt patterns for the 4 skirt styles, (tight, flare 1, flare 2, and flare 3 skirts) in previous paper [11], as shown in appendix 2) The sensitivity images' DEn for the 72 skirt photographs (scale of 1 to 7), as shown in Table 2 and Fig. 1, are evaluated for the fabric curved shape images of DE1 to DE5 using the semantic differential (SD) method and the design curved shape images of DE6 to DE11 using the five-grade evaluation system method.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) The physical properties of the 3D curvature parameters CKn and CHn, and the conventional fabric parameter for Mn are as follows. CKn and CHn show the design curved shape parameters of CK1 to CK4 (|Σ±Kc|+|Σ±kc|) and CH1 to CH4 (|Σ±Hc|) in each area of the back, front, sides of the right and left, and all total areas of the 72 skirts, and Mn represents the fabric curved shape parameters M1 to M6 [11] (see Table 2, appendix shape, Kc < 0 (-Kc); hyperbolic curved shape, Kc = 0; developable surface curved shape, kc > 0 (+kc); convex line curved shape, kc < 0 (-kc); concave line curved shape, kc = 0; straight line curved shape, Hc > 0 (convex surface shape +Hc); mountain fold curved shape, Hc < 0 (concave surface shape -Hc); valley fold curved shape, and Hc = 0; plane surface shape. The three fabric curved shape images of DE1 to DE3 had significant relationships with all six design curved shape images of We were able to determine that the fabric curved shape images of DE1 to DE3 influenced the design curved shape images of DE6 to DE11.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations