2012
DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.me11304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction of Bacterial RNA from Soil: Challenges and Solutions

Abstract: Detection of bacterial gene expression in soil emerged in the early 1990s and provided information on bacterial responses in their original soil environments. As a key procedure in the detection, extraction of bacterial RNA from soil has attracted much interest, and many methods of soil RNA extraction have been reported in the past 20 years. In addition to various RT-PCR-based technologies, new technologies for gene expression analysis, such as microarrays and high-throughput sequencing technologies, have rece… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
(245 reference statements)
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Absence of genomic DNA was confirmed by quantitative PCR without reverse transcriptase. Successful extraction of total RNA from micro-organisms in soil has been restricted to bacterial species (Dineen et al, 2010;Fang et al, 2014;Griffiths et al, 2000;Gunnigle et al, 2014;Hahn et al, 1990;Lillis et al, 2009;Mikkonen et al, 2014;Novinscak & Filion, 2011;Selenska & Klingmüller, 1992;Sessitsch et al, 2002;Sharma et al, 2004;Wang et al, 2009Wang et al, , 2012. To our knowledge, this represents the first report of the isolation of quality fungal RNA from soil.…”
Section: Stage-specific Genes Trichodermamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Absence of genomic DNA was confirmed by quantitative PCR without reverse transcriptase. Successful extraction of total RNA from micro-organisms in soil has been restricted to bacterial species (Dineen et al, 2010;Fang et al, 2014;Griffiths et al, 2000;Gunnigle et al, 2014;Hahn et al, 1990;Lillis et al, 2009;Mikkonen et al, 2014;Novinscak & Filion, 2011;Selenska & Klingmüller, 1992;Sessitsch et al, 2002;Sharma et al, 2004;Wang et al, 2009Wang et al, , 2012. To our knowledge, this represents the first report of the isolation of quality fungal RNA from soil.…”
Section: Stage-specific Genes Trichodermamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…mRNA is not often used for the assessment of microbial community function of environmental samples due to its general instability, and difficulty in its proper extraction [42]. The study of Lünsmann et al [32] was completed in lab-scale, well controlled TWs.…”
Section: Functional Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is quite a step. mRNA can be exceptionally difficult to extract from environmental samples [42]. If mRNA extraction for TWs is possible on a wider scale, micro-array and qPCR analysis could begin to return active function information.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Horizonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aneja et al [14] carried out random arbitrarily primed PCR (RAP-PCR) on the meta transcriptome of plant litter degrading microbial community and differential expression was successfully observed at various stages of degradation. Active populations of both eukaryotes and prokaryotes had been successfully identified by meta transcriptome based reverse transcription and sequencing of rRNA (RNA-Seq, [15]). Meta transcriptomics based study allows detection of sequences associated with a particular environmental condition that may not be so readily identified in metagenomic studies and increases the chance of detecting ecologically relevant active functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several commercial kits have been made available for extracting RNA from diverse ecological samples as summarized by Wang et al [15]. Of these, MoBio RNA Power Soil Total RNA Isolation Kit has been widely used [23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%