Extraction of chelerythrine and its effects on pathogenic fungus spore germination

Abstract

Background:Chemical fungicides are widely used to control crop diseases, but these chemicals have adverse effects. They destroy the ecological environment and even have toxic effects on human beings. In this context, the development of botanical pesticides is relevant. One potential botanical pesticide is chelerythrine, a main alkaloid of Chelidonium majus L., which has high antitumor, fungistasis, and antiphlogosis bioactivity.Objective:This study was designed to present an ultrasonic extraction method for chelerythrine and spore germination experiments to inhibit pathogenic fungi. Fungistasis of chelerythrine is now centralized in basic microbiology experiments, such as observing bacteriostatic rings. This study investigates chelerythrine based on pathogenic fungal spore germination and the influence of germ tube elongation.Materials and Methods:Samples of C. majus L., which were wild used in this experiment, were picked from Harbin experimental forest farm of Northeast Forestry University. An L9 (34) orthogonal experiment was designed to optimize the ultrasonic extraction method. All the plant pathogenic fungus strains used in the experiment were preservation strains of Northeast Forestry University Microbial preservation center. Pathogenic fungi were cultivated by joining chelerythrine with and observed germ tube growth and spore germination.Results:The optimum ultrasonication extraction process for chelerythrine has a liquid/solid ratio of 1:8, 35 min of extraction time, 85% of ultrasonic frequency, and 75% of ethanol concentration. When the concentration of chelerythrine was 1.7 × 10−2 mg/ml, the inhibition rates of Septoria microspora Speg. spores and Curvularia lunata were 96.67% and 84.94%, respectively. Moreover, when the concentration of chelerythrine was 1.7 × 10−6 mg/ml, the inhibition rates of S. microspora spores and C. lunata were 47.64% and 12.05%, respectively.Conclusion:Fungistasis activity reached a high level with 1.7 × 10−6 mg/ml of chelerythrine. Chelerythrine has the characteristics of less dosage and obvious fungistasis and has a good prospect for botanical fungicide development.SUMMARY S. microspora spores in chelerythrine concentration of 1.7 × 10−6 mg/ml have an inhibition rate of 47.64%. For chelerythrine concentrations 1.7 × 10−5, 1.7 × 10−4, and 1.7 × 10−3 mg/ml, the inhibition rate is 70%, 80%, and 90%, respectively. When the concentration of chelerythrine was original 1.7 × 10−2 mg/ml, the inhibition rate was 96.67%. As shown in the diagram, the germinal tubes of S. microspora spores were shorter than 50 µm with 1.7 × 10−6, 1.7 × 10−5, and 1.7 × 10−4 mg/ml concentrations of chelerythrine. However, the germinal tubes of spores without chelerythrine could reach 80 µm. With 1.7 × 10−3 mg/ml liquid concentration, the germination was severely inhibited; the germination under concentrate chelerythrine was limited. The inhibitory effect of chelerythrine was greatest in S. microspora. Abbreviations used: C. majus L.: Chelidonium majus L.; Sphaerulina juglandis: S. juglandis; Septoria micr...

Metabolomics analysis of the effects of chelerythrine on <i>Ustilaginoidea virens</i>

“…Spores and Curvularia lunata were 96.67% and 84.94%, respectively. 15 ) CHE achieved more potent inhibition of the mycelia of U. virens than A.ruber , M.oryzae and C.miyabeanus when concentration of CHE was 0.0075 mg/mL in the present study. In our previous study, compared to chelidonidine, sanguinarine and validamycin, CHE remarkably inhibited mycelial growth of U.virens at the concentrations of 0.0075 mg/mL.…”

Greater Celandine's Ups and Downs−21 Centuries of Medicinal Uses of Chelidonium majus From the Viewpoint of Today's Pharmacology

“…Chelerythrine [9] was also able to inhibit spore germination of several plant pathogenic fungi: Sphaerulina juglandis, Septoria microspora, Fusarium oxysporum , and Curvularia lunata . It suggests the actual biological—antipathogenic function of isoquinoline alkaloids in the plant (Wei et al, 2017 ). However, no particular structural feature seems to be pinpointed as a determinant of antimicrobial potency despite some variation in activity toward different strains between individual alkaloids.…”