Fifth International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment (RSCy2017) 2017
DOI: 10.1117/12.2277522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction of inland Nypa fruticans (Nipa Palm) using Support Vector Machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Utilization of very high-resolution images has become a new trend in forest management, particularly in the detection and identification of forest stand variables. Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification process was used to extract Nipa (Nypa fructicans) with a high accuracy (95%) in inland areas by using the available LiDAR data [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilization of very high-resolution images has become a new trend in forest management, particularly in the detection and identification of forest stand variables. Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification process was used to extract Nipa (Nypa fructicans) with a high accuracy (95%) in inland areas by using the available LiDAR data [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there persist challenges, as highlighted by Wang et al [ 37 ], for example, the erroneous identification of understorey coverage as dense mangrove forest in Segara Anakan, as noted by Winarso et al [38 , 39] . In the case of mangrove monitoring in Segara Anakan, detecting nypa in the mangrove matrix is also difficult, as it is limited to high-resolution or synthetic aperture radar and LiDAR [1] , or medium-resolution when combined with unmanned aerial vehicles [28] . Indeed, the identification of understorey and the encroachment of nypa palm in Segara Anakan is crucial for monitoring the decline of mangrove trees in the area.…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%