2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction of lithium from brines with high Mg/Li ratio by the crystallization-precipitation method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5−9 Lime-soda evaporation has been used in mass production; however, this method suffers from some major issues, e.g., low efficiency, high energy consumption, and long time consumption. 10,11 Ion exchange has high selectivity for Li + ; however, this method raises environmental concerns owing to the acid wash procedure for regeneration of ion-exchange absorbents. 12−14 Solvent extrac-tion is suitable for treating brine with a high magnesium− lithium ratio; however, plenty of organic solvents are used in this process, causing environmental pollution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5−9 Lime-soda evaporation has been used in mass production; however, this method suffers from some major issues, e.g., low efficiency, high energy consumption, and long time consumption. 10,11 Ion exchange has high selectivity for Li + ; however, this method raises environmental concerns owing to the acid wash procedure for regeneration of ion-exchange absorbents. 12−14 Solvent extrac-tion is suitable for treating brine with a high magnesium− lithium ratio; however, plenty of organic solvents are used in this process, causing environmental pollution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, a variety of methods for Li + extraction from salt lakes have been developed, including lime-soda evaporation, ion exchange, solvent extraction, adsorption, membrane method, and electrochemical extraction. Lime-soda evaporation has been used in mass production; however, this method suffers from some major issues, e.g., low efficiency, high energy consumption, and long time consumption. , Ion exchange has high selectivity for Li + ; however, this method raises environmental concerns owing to the acid wash procedure for regeneration of ion-exchange absorbents. Solvent extraction is suitable for treating brine with a high magnesium–lithium ratio; however, plenty of organic solvents are used in this process, causing environmental pollution. , Ion-sieve adsorption presents excellent selectivity for Li ions; however, this method still has some drawbacks, such as the risk of environmental pollution, slow adsorption rates, and poor recyclability. Membrane separation is a pure physical separation operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, several techniques are available for Li­(I) extraction from salt-lake brines, such as precipitation, extraction, , membrane separation and coupling, salt-gradient solar ponds, , and adsorption methods . Nowadays, the adsorption method is one of the promising techniques to extract Li­(I) from salt lakes, owing to the advantages of high efficiency, simplicity of operation, and low energy consumption .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decades, significant effort has been made to recover lithium from brines and seawater by precipitation, solvent extraction, , adsorption, and membrane separation. Despite these advances, efficient but selective uptake of lithium from aqueous solutions is still a significant challenge. For instance, the precipitation route is often suitable for aqueous solutions containing high-concentration Li but a low Mg/Li ratio. , The solvent extraction for lithium separation usually uses hazard organic solvents inevitably. , Although the adsorption method is promising for recovering lithium at a low concentration, the harmful acid is always required to leach out lithium. ,, In addition, the high cost of separation membranes will limit their scale-up applications .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decades, significant effort has been made to recover lithium from brines and seawater by precipitation, solvent extraction, , adsorption, and membrane separation. Despite these advances, efficient but selective uptake of lithium from aqueous solutions is still a significant challenge. For instance, the precipitation route is often suitable for aqueous solutions containing high-concentration Li but a low Mg/Li ratio. , The solvent extraction for lithium separation usually uses hazard organic solvents inevitably. , Although the adsorption method is promising for recovering lithium at a low concentration, the harmful acid is always required to leach out lithium. ,, In addition, the high cost of separation membranes will limit their scale-up applications . Electrochemistry-based technologies with low energy consumption, superior selectivity toward lithium, and environmental friendliness have attracted widespread attention. Among them, capacitive deionization (CDI) has been developed for separating charged ionic species from aqueous solutions by electrochemical or electrostatic interactions, which is regarded as an emerging water desalination technique. Since carbon-based materials (e.g., carbon nanotubes, graphene, mesoporous carbon, and carbon black) possess a high surface area and excellent electrical conductivity, they are widely used as electrode materials for CDI to remove ionic species (e.g., Cr 6+ , Cu 2+ , Pb 2+ , , nitrate, , perchlorate, sulfate, , and Li +51 ) from water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%