Extraction of naturally occurring cannabinoids: an update

Abstract

Introduction Organic molecules that interact with the cannabinoid receptors are called cannabinoids, which can be endogenous, natural or synthetic compounds. They possess similar pharmacological properties as produced by the plant, Cannabis sativa L. Before cannabinoids can be analysed, they need to be extracted from the matrices. Objective To review literature on the methods and protocols for the extraction of naturally occurring cannabinoids. Methodology An extensive literature search was performed incorporating several databases, notably, Web of Knowledge, PubMed and Google Scholar, and other relevant published materials. The keywords used in the search, in various combinations, with cannabinoids and extraction being present in all combinations, were Cannabis, hemp, cannabinoids, Cannabis sativa, marijuana, and extraction. Results In addition to classical maceration with organic solvents, e.g. ethanol, pressurised solvent extraction, solvent heat reflux, Soxhlet extraction, supercritical fluid extraction, ultrasound‐assisted extraction and microwave‐assisted extraction, are routinely used nowadays for the extraction of cannabinoids from plant materials and cannabis consumer products. For the extraction of cannabinoids from biological samples, e.g. human blood, and also from food and beverages, and wastewater, solid‐phase extraction and its variants, as well as liquid–liquid extraction are commonly used. Parameters for extraction can be optimised by response surface methodology or other mathematical modelling tools. There are at least six US patents on extraction of cannabinoids available to date. Conclusions Irrespective of the extraction method, extraction temperature, extraction time and extraction pressure play a vital role in overall yield of extraction. Solvent polarity can also be an important factor in some extraction methods.

A Multimethodological Characterization of Cannabis sativa L. Inflorescences from Seven Dioecious Cultivars Grown in Italy: The Effect of Different Harvesting Stages

“…For each sample, 4 g of ground fresh inflorescences were dried at 70 °C for 48 h before extraction. After drying, 100 mg of inflorescences were extracted with 4 mL of methanol [ 39 , 40 ] in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min. The residual pellet was re-extracted again two times.…”

New perspective for the in-field analysis of cannabis samples using handheld near-infrared spectroscopy: A case study focusing on the determination of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol

“…In addition to LC, supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) is progressively gaining momentum in cannabis analysis due to its advantages in terms of lower analysis time and lesser ecological impact compared to LC [8,12,13]. However, as with chromatographic technique, when the original sample is in a solid form, a prior extraction procedure (generally solid-liquid extraction) is needed, which is time-consuming and achievable only with appropriate instrumentation in a laboratory [14]. Moreover, this represents a critical procedure that is at the basis of intra-and interlaboratory variabilities, as recently highlighted in the literature [15][16][17].…”

Cannabis medicinal: más allá del mito, solo otra droga (vegetal)

“…Dos de estos son los más estudiados, el cannabidiol (CBD) y el delta-9-tetrahidrocannabinol (THC) (6,7) . Estos fitocannabinoides no son exclusivos de C. sativa, sino que también se encuentran en algunas otras plantas, como Acmella oleracea, Echinacea angustifolia, Echinacea purpurea, Helichrysum umbraculigerum y Radula marginata, entre otras (8) .…”