Extraction of primary (baby) teeth for unerupted palatally displaced permanent canine teeth in children

Parkin, Nicola; Furness, Susan; Shah, Asad Hussain; Thind, Bikram; Marshman, Zoe; Glenroy, Gillian; Dyer, Florence E.; Benson, Philip

doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004621.pub3

Cited by 25 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…No previous studies have, in a randomly selected group of young children with PDC, prospectively studied pain and discomfort related to the extraction of primary canines 21,22 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pain, discomfort, and use of analgesics following the extraction of primary canines in children with palatally displaced canines

Naoumova¹,

Kjellberg²,

Kurol³

et al. 2011

Int J Paed Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND. Pain following the extraction of the primary canine in children with palatally displaced canines (PDC) as an interceptive treatment has not been investigated. AIMS. To describe pain, discomfort, dental anxiety, and use of analgesics following the extraction of primary canines in children with PDC. DESIGN. Forty-four children, aged 10-13 with PDC, were included. Pain intensity, discomfort, and analgesic consumption were rated the first evening and 1 week after the extraction of the primary canine. Dental anxiety was assessed pre-extraction, using the dental anxiety scale (DAS). A matched reference group also completed the DAS. RESULTS. No significant differences were found between the study and the reference group regarding the pre-extraction assessments. Post-extraction pain and discomfort was low. The experience of the injection was graded worse than the extraction, and more pain was rated at the evening post-extraction than during the extraction. Analgesics were used only the first evening. High correlation was detected between DAS and pain during injection and extraction. CONCLUSIONS. The experience of pain and discomfort during and after extraction of the primary canines is low, despite that 42% of the children used analgesics. Therefore, appropriate analgesics and recommendation doses pre- and post-extraction should be prescribed.

show abstract

“…No previous studies have, in a randomly selected group of young children with PDC, prospectively studied pain and discomfort related to the extraction of primary canines 21,22 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pain, discomfort, and use of analgesics following the extraction of primary canines in children with palatally displaced canines

Naoumova¹,

Kjellberg²,

Kurol³

et al. 2011

Int J Paed Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[Alqerban, Jacobs, Lambrechts, Loozen, & Willems, ] Extraction of the deciduous canines can encourage spontaneous eruption of the permanent canines. [Baccetti, Mucedero, Leonardi, & Cozza, ; Leonardi, Armi, Franchi, & Baccetti, ; Naoumova, Kürol, & Kjellberg, ; Naoumova & Kjellberg, ; Parkin, Benson, & Shah, ] Other complications may result if early intervention is not performed, such as pain, infection, cyst formation, ankylosis, internal or external resorption of the canine, and the adjacent teeth. [Alqerban, Jacobs, Lambrechts, et al, ; Bishara et al, ]…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prediction of maxillary canine impaction based on panoramic radiographs

Raes

Maria

Alqerban

et al. 2019

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The objective of this article is to establish a large sample‐based prediction model for maxillary canine impaction based on linear and angular measurements on panoramic radiographs and to validate this model. Materials and methods All patients with at least two panoramic radiographs taken between the ages of 7 and 14 years with an interval of minimum 1 year and maximum 3 years (T1 and T2) were selected from the Department of Oral Health Sciences, University Hospital Leuven database. Linear and angular measurements were performed at T1. From 2361 records, 572 patients with unilateral or bilateral canine impaction were selected at T1. Of those, 306 patients were still untreated at T2 and were used as study sample. To construct the prediction model, logistic regression analysis was used. Results The parameters analyzed through backward selection procedure were canine to midline angle, canine to first premolar angle, canine cusp to midline distance, canine cusp to maxillary plane distance, sector, quadratic trends for continuous predictors, and all pairwise interactions. The final model was applied to calculate the likelihood of impaction and yielded an area under the curve equal to 0.783 (95% CI [0.742–0.823]). The cut‐off point was fixed on 0.342 with a sensitivity of 0.800 and a specificity of 0.598. The cross‐validated area under the curve was equal to 0.750 (95% CI [0.700, 0.799]). Conclusion The prediction model based on the above mentioned parameters measured on panoramic radiographs is a valuable tool to decide between early intervention and regular follow‐up of impacted canines.

show abstract

“…Parkin et al 19 conducted a systematic review in 2009 in which they were unable to provide reliable evidence to support the effectiveness of interceptive extraction of deciduous canines to manage PDCs. Later, Naoumova et al 3 (2011) included two studies in their systematic review to determine whether extraction of primary canines helps prevent the impaction of permanent maxillary canines.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, robust evidence in favor of their hypothesis was limited. In 2012, Parkin et al 20 considered two studies for their systematic review to determine whether complications of PDCs can be prevented via the extraction of primary canines. Due to the lack of reliable studies, the authors of these systematic reviews stressed the need for more clinical trials with high-quality methodology.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Due to the lack of reliable studies, the authors of these systematic reviews stressed the need for more clinical trials with high-quality methodology. 3,19,20 As a result, two recent randomized clinical trials reported the spontaneous correction of PDCs after the extraction of primary canines. 21,22 The present systematic review summarized the relevant randomized clinical trials to provide reliable estimates of the efficacy of interceptive orthodontic intervention, specifically, to find out whether successful management of PDCs can be achieved by interceptive extraction of deciduous maxillary canines.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Extraction of primary canines for interceptive orthodontic treatment of palatally displaced permanent canines: A systematic review

Almasoud

2017

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Extraction of primary (baby) teeth for unerupted palatally displaced permanent canine teeth in children

Abstract: There is currently no evidence of the effects of extraction of primary canine teeth in 10-13 year old children with one or two palatally displaced permanent canine teeth.

Cited by 25 publications

References 22 publications

Pain, discomfort, and use of analgesics following the extraction of primary canines in children with palatally displaced canines

Pain, discomfort, and use of analgesics following the extraction of primary canines in children with palatally displaced canines

Prediction of maxillary canine impaction based on panoramic radiographs

Extraction of primary canines for interceptive orthodontic treatment of palatally displaced permanent canines: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About