2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-019-7185-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction of spiculated parts of mammogram tumors to improve accuracy of classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer masses that was performed with high accuracy in this study, according to the morphological and simple features of cancer masses, classification operation was performed well and with high accuracy. The results of this study show the higher performance of the proposed method compared to other methods used in previous related studies [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…After the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer masses that was performed with high accuracy in this study, according to the morphological and simple features of cancer masses, classification operation was performed well and with high accuracy. The results of this study show the higher performance of the proposed method compared to other methods used in previous related studies [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Pratiwi et al [39] proposed feature selection based on the GLCM method for the same datasets and got the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were 93.90, 97.20 and 91.50 %, respectively. Pezeshki et al [40] used ANN approaches and got an accuracy of 61 % which is very less as compare to this proposed model. Gupta et al [41] used a deep learning technique using Adam gradient descent accuracy achieved 1.16 % lesser than the proposed method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Additionally, the selection of a classifier suitable for these features enhances the model's performance in classification tasks. The results were compared with those of the studies other authors [35], [36], [37] as listed in Table VII. This demonstrates that the boosting ensemble model outperforms the other methods.…”
Section: Classification Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%