2019
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2019.2893651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction of Time-Varying Spatiotemporal Networks Using Parameter-Tuned Constrained IVA

Abstract: Dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) analysis is an effective way to capture the networks that are functionally associated and continuously changing over the scanning period. However, these methods mostly analyze the dynamic associations across the activation patterns of the spatial networks while assuming that the spatial networks are stationary. Hence, a model that allows for the variability in both domains and reduces the assumptions imposed on the data provides an effective way for extracting spatio-tempo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each d n , we obtain 10 solutions using parameter-tuned cIVA with γ n = 3, n = 1, …, N , using the IVA-L-SOS algorithm for different random initializations and select the most consistent run using the method described in Long et al (2018b). IVA-L-SOS is a type of IVA algorithm that assumes the sources are multivariate Laplacian distributed and exploits second order statistics (SOS) (Bhinge et al, 2019). This algorithm provides a better match to the properties of fMRI sources, since fMRI sources are in general expected to have a super-Gaussian distribution, like Laplacian (Calhoun and Adali, 2012), and are correlated across windows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For each d n , we obtain 10 solutions using parameter-tuned cIVA with γ n = 3, n = 1, …, N , using the IVA-L-SOS algorithm for different random initializations and select the most consistent run using the method described in Long et al (2018b). IVA-L-SOS is a type of IVA algorithm that assumes the sources are multivariate Laplacian distributed and exploits second order statistics (SOS) (Bhinge et al, 2019). This algorithm provides a better match to the properties of fMRI sources, since fMRI sources are in general expected to have a super-Gaussian distribution, like Laplacian (Calhoun and Adali, 2012), and are correlated across windows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independent vector analysis (IVA) provides a general and flexible framework to spatio-temporal dFNC analysis and estimates window-specific time courses and spatial maps. However its performance degrades with increase in the size of the data, for a given number of samples (Bhinge et al, 2019). Hence, in this work, we use a data-driven method to jointly extract spatio-temporal patterns using the subsequent extraction of exemplar and dynamic components using constrained IVA (SED-cIVA) method (Bhinge et al, 2019), from a large-scale fMRI data acquired from 91 healthy controls and 88 patients with schizophrenia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Condition-specific brain states are characterised by reduced and less defined functional connectivity and more frequent recurrence [74,[95][96][97][98][99][100][101]. A higher temporal variability of dFC time-courses, was reported in schizophrenic patients in several attention, perceptual and emotion regulation RSNs [102][103][104][105][106], and related to a disruption in perceptual functions [105,107]. In contrast, lower temporal variability was reported for the default mode and fronto-parietal networks [105,107].…”
Section: Functional Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several strategies for raw data aggregation can be implemented for building group inferences, including serial/parallel combinations of subject-level feature sets to form a more extensive multi-subject array (Lio and Boulinguez, 2016). Instead, data-driven approaches have also been employed to infer collective feature structures, like joint diagonalization (Gong et al, 2018), temporally constrained sparse representation (Zhang et al, 2019), canonical correlation analysis (de Cheveigné et al, 2019), and versions derived from independent Component Analysis (Emge et al, 2018;Huster and Raud, 2018;Bhinge et al, 2019), among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%