2018
DOI: 10.4103/ijor.ijor_40_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction Versus Non-Extraction: A Retrospective Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As there is no sliding of the wire in between the brackets, the friction is not involved and hence helps with the anchorage control during the initial canine retraction (Vaidya et al). 10 However, precise control of tooth movement is possible in a predictable manner with the Tloop. This leads to anchorage preservation and increased rate of tooth movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there is no sliding of the wire in between the brackets, the friction is not involved and hence helps with the anchorage control during the initial canine retraction (Vaidya et al). 10 However, precise control of tooth movement is possible in a predictable manner with the Tloop. This leads to anchorage preservation and increased rate of tooth movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there is no sliding of the wire in between the brackets, the friction is not involved and hence helps with the anchorage control during the initial canine retraction. [9] Although temporary anchorage devices have been widely used for anchorage reinforcement, there are unpredictable factors such as anatomical limitations and the possibility of failure. However, precise control of tooth movement is possible in a predictable manner with the T-loop.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%